I wonder if they aren’t touching it because they want to address this question in context of considering Jan. 6. They don’t want to risk contradicting themselves and are waiting to get all their ducks in a row.
I have no legal background so this is just idle speculation.
They aren’t touching it because they already DID with Counterman v. Colorado back in 2023. The issue is done and Sotomayor made this plain in her full remarks.
This Vox article was carefully crafted to leave the reader ignorant and outraged.
I wonder if they aren’t touching it because they want to address this question in context of considering Jan. 6. They don’t want to risk contradicting themselves and are waiting to get all their ducks in a row.
I have no legal background so this is just idle speculation.
It’s more likely that they’re not touching it because they want to suppress African-American protests. [I am also not a lawyer]
why not both.
Clarence Thomas would vote against African American interests? Vanish the thought! /s
They aren’t touching it because they already DID with Counterman v. Colorado back in 2023. The issue is done and Sotomayor made this plain in her full remarks.
This Vox article was carefully crafted to leave the reader ignorant and outraged.