• meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it’s wild how people post “omg I just got this entire series for $299! It was on sale so I had to!” Like in 5 years, you may not even have it! Company goes under. Gets bought out. Or my personal favourite, it becomes unavailable because the owner pulled it over a legal dispute. Like so many songs off Spotify. These companies never get involved like well we got our cash too bad so sad.

    🏴‍☠️

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah that’s why I buy DVDs if it’s something that I actually want to keep. I don’t mind streaming as long as you understand that you own nothing.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup, it’s a great way to fill that “I want to watch something” need.

      I buy and rip DVDs/Blu-rays that I want to keep, and then stream the rips from my NAS. It works pretty well.

  • nyan@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Companies should be sued for false advertising if they claim that their streaming service allows you to “buy” or “own” anything (unless their service includes non-DRM downloads for permanent offline storage). All you’re buying is temporary use of their rental network and library. Which is fine if that’s what you wanted and knew you were getting, but a problem if you were expecting something else.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    “We’ve partnered with Fetch as our new entertainment platform and the vast majority of movies or shows customers have bought on their Telstra TV Box Office can be migrated across,” the spokesperson said.

    Now firmly in the streaming age, ownership is largely subject to the terms and conditions people often do not read, a lecturer in computing and information systems at Melbourne University, Shaanan Cohney, said.

    “It is not reasonable to expect consumers to read these terms and conditions [but] in the case of Telstra TV box office, they had a whole section on how they were able to withdraw content.”

    Cohney said there is a strong moral argument – but not a legal one – to explain why people resort to downloading copyright-infringing content via torrent websites.

    Users now need to use a virtual private network connection to access these sites, and rights holders argue this hurdle has substantially reduced piracy in Australia.

    “It’s having mandatory rules around what kinds of things can be in the terms of conditions … If a provider wants to offer content in a way that is in violation of those, there has to be some substantial indication that it’s in the interests of the consumer as well as very clear disclosure of that particular change.”


    The original article contains 951 words, the summary contains 212 words. Saved 78%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • eee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Should companies work on improving access to services and making sure paying consumers get a better experience?

    Nah, let’s spend more money paying lawyers to go after a few people, that’ll show em.

  • slurpinderpin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If buying isn’t owning, then pirating isn’t stealing.

    Fair winds and following seas to you fellow sailors, arrrrr

    • LinusSexTips@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      From my nixos config.

      Corps are fucked, I’ve got no issues pirating content. If I want to support someone I’ll pay up but the majority of content is background filler for me.

      Why would I want to sub to Amazon just to watch Jeremy Clarkson’s new show, where he was paid $200m to support him? It baffles the mind the volume of cash that’s thrown around in that world.

      I’d much rather spend my money down the pub on a Sunday, which is owned by locals, has local beers on tap with a local solo musician jamming out the front.

      For me, there’s much more value in an experience with the quirks of it being live, a quick witted bartender, a great cover, an old bloke retelling stories he’s told 100 times before, a forgotten lyric or even a snapped string on a guitar.

      Or I’m starting to show my age 😎

    • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can understand piracy when they take away something you’ve already bought, but I’d not want to do it for something I haven’t bought yet.

      I wanna be able to support people creating what I like.

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have bought some games after pirating them - because I loved them. Still kept the pirated copies for the sake of ownership though.

      • slurpinderpin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I actually probably provide more support for the things I like because I pirate. Look at it this way - if I had to subscribe to a million services, I just wouldn’t watch a lot of things (because I don’t like spending money month over month for services). Now, I download what I want to watch, and if it’s good I go and tell my friends and family (who aren’t pirates) how good it is and they go and watch it, bringing more eyeballs to their show/movie than they would’ve had otherwise. Pirating isn’t stealing or taking away from creatives imo

        • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I can’t agree, but I can agree to disagree with you.

          For me as long as you’re not paying for some form of art, you’re not supporting the artist, so you’re stealing.

          But I’d be the first one to download a torrent if something I paid for kind of disappeared like this.

          • slurpinderpin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Haha agree to disagree. I’m paying them through eXpOsuRe (jk)

            Yeah I don’t feel an ounce of remorse about it, but if I did I probably wouldn’t do it!

      • BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Though I agree about ‘financial support for content creator’ I think our model of copyright doesn’t work.

        I’d love your opinion

        Should a content creator keep making money forever once something is produced ? Would you prefer to buy rather than pirate a movie that was made 100 years ago ? Let’s say you never bought any Charlie Chaplin movie, would you buy it if you wanted to watch it ?

        The reason I ask is because I’m still unclear myself about what is morally right on this topic. I tend to pirate a lot nowadays because I don’t know how to support content creators without filling the pockets of intermediary leeches

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          My personal rule is that I’ll buy it as long as the original creators are profiting from new sales. So I’m happy to buy Switch games, but I’m probably not going to buy N64 games because they’re not available from the original devs.

          I may buy even if that’s not the case if buying is a better experience than getting it some other way.

          If DRM-free digital copies existed for movies, I’d buy them. But they don’t, so I buy physical media and rip it to my NAS.

  • BuckyVanBuren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, got rid of all my CDs a few years ago and now I’m buying them back a bit at the time because of all the stuff that is going out of print and you can no longer stream.

    Should have just stored everything.

  • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been a user of GOG for a while principally because of the no-drm ability to download a copy of what you bought. When the library starts getting past a certain size though you start to wonder about those things like what if the producer has a falling out and wants to yank it from the platform, does it vanish from my library then too? Are there contracts that say ‘forever’ when they offer it? Would love to find some ‘download all’ option to take a full copy offline of the bought items at once but it’d probably overrun the monthly ISP limits even if they had one.

    Seen too many things on Netflix or Spotify that I liked vanish because ‘fuck off, we can’ and although I never anticipated it being ‘bought’ in those cases it does give a lot of justification to find alternate means to reestablish that access.

  • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s why I’ll keep buying physical for the games or movies I love.

    The only question I have is what’s gonna happen as game discs are just becoming an access token to download the game and its updates.

    I’d have nothing against digital games or movies if you didn’t see such behaviors.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Make sure you’ve got a spare DVD/Blu-Ray player somewhere that works without needing an internet connection.

      Oh, you mean when the discs themselves no longer contain the data… Yeah…

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Xbox “backwards compatibility” already works that way. It doesn’t run the code from the disc, it downloads a compatible digital version.

    • Phelpssan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The only question I have is what’s gonna happen as game discs are just becoming an access token to download the game and its updates.

      That’s a big concern. There’s communities trying to document which games are complete on the media and can be played from start to end without updates (so no major game-breaking bugs or huge performance issues) like this one:

      https://www.doesitplay.org/

      I’m also part of a FB group that collects cartridge information for Switch games, to document if there’s revisions with all updates included.

      https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1CEABCBrPv1tWf89hSZqUunK0JW-sQo8XpxuvZhdtHQs/edit#gid=0

      • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s good that people are worrying about this. Although, I haven’t heard of any disc game not being able to be played. I guess it would only happen if Sony/Microsoft go bankrupt or decide to close PlayStation/Xbox game updates servers.

        It ain’t likely to happen but it’s important to be able to preserve games for the future as they are part of history just like paintings.

        • Phelpssan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I haven’t heard of any disc game not being able to be played.

          There’s a number of games that don’t come with the whole thing on disk/cart, usually including only the early stages and the rest needs to be downloaded.

          Hogwarts Legacy and Jedi Survivor are two fairly recent examples.

          • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            As long as you have a way to download the data that ain’t a problem for me, but if one day Sony or EA closes without giving the update data to be available for everyone that would be a problem.

            Still I don’t see the advantage for them to only put the early stages on the disc. Are they saving money this way?

            • Phelpssan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Either saving on media costs (25GB disc instead of 100GB disc, maybe 1 disc instead of 2 if the game is too big), or even having more time to work on the game.

              Developer makes sure the early stages are properly tested, send the disc for manufacturing including only those, use the manufacturing time to tweak/bugfix/optimize more stuff the rest of the game.

  • 7rokhym@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The other concern is censorship. Essentially a movie that you bought is on a server and then someone’s decided that words, content, or scenes are no longer appropriate. The video, song, etc, is different from the original and without any notification. The old scenes get sent to the memory hole. Oh dear Winston, I fear we will meet soon!

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Aarrrrr, I spotted a mythical jellyfin, strrrrraight ahead! It’s even new and shiny!

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, if it’s in “The Cloud” it’s NOT yours and it can disappear or be modified without your knowledge or consent at any time.

    Buy some external storage and keep copies of everything you care about.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is why I’m actually ok with Hulu. All the Futurama, archer, and Rick and Morty episodes are worth the monthly fee everything else is a bonus. If those disappear I’m ok with cancelling the service.

  • CannedCairn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is there a good way to pay for a download of movies or TV, or should I go back to buying physical and ripping?