• Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    That would certainly be nice. Kinda just tossed the idea out there tho; IANAL as well.

    I’m just familiar with the general concept, but looking closer at the details; it seems that may only apply after an actual acquittal/conviction.

    You could probably run two simultaneous trials, and only apply the double jeopardy clause once one of the two trials concludes (nullifing/halting the later trial), but I’m not all that sure.

    No idea if any case law actually supports this idea.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      No, committing two murders doesn’t mean one invalidates the other. Finding more documents warrants additional charges.

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        We aren’t talking about seprate crimes, or additional charges; we’re discussing starting a second trial for the same set of charges crimes, while the first trial is still proceeding/on hold.

        • snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yes, we ARE talking about a new and separate set of charges for the ADDITIONAL documents.

          Can they just file a new set of charges and hope for a different Judge?