• bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    He has been convicted but technically he is not a “a convicted felon” yet. It’s just a technicality. He’s a convicted felon to me already lol

    • StinkyOnions@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re arguing over trivial semantics, my guy. What’s the point? He’s a felon, there was a conviction, and he is awaiting sentencing. Hence CONVICTED FELON.

    • idiomaddict@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know where you’re getting that though. He is technically and really a convicted felon. You can say it and he can’t sue you (yet. No promises if he wins and declares himself god-king)

        • idiomaddict@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You got me, I’m both accustomed to a rough peasant life and fragile to the touch like a snowflake. It feels nice to finally be understood

      • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I heard it from a legal scholar on a podcast the other day who was very clear it’s a small but real technicality, but unfortunately i can’t find anything because it’s pages and pages of headlines announcing he’s the first convicted felon president.

        Either way it doesn’t matter. I just thought it was interesting. I only hope he gets a dozen more convictions lol dude’s a criminal and he deserves that and more.

        • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          LegalEagle said the same thing in the Nebula version of their video on the subject, but it’s a hair that really isn’t worth splitting.