jeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years agoExperts: DOJ has "sufficient evidence" to probe Clarence Thomas — but Garland won't go for itwww.salon.comexternal-linkmessage-square50linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkExperts: DOJ has "sufficient evidence" to probe Clarence Thomas — but Garland won't go for itwww.salon.comjeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square50linkfedilink
minus-square5in1k@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoSo the republicans are so criminal we can’t investigate them because of optics. I hate the government. Top to bottom.
minus-squarenondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoIf optics are mob threats are why you cant investigate corruption then in a very real sense right wing terrorism is working on the government.
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoWe don’t negotiate with terrorists; we preemptively capitulate.
minus-squareCharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoIf money is speech, it becomes the ONLY speech.
So the republicans are so criminal we can’t investigate them because of optics. I hate the government. Top to bottom.
If optics are mob threats are why you cant investigate corruption then in a very real sense right wing terrorism is working on the government.
We don’t negotiate with terrorists; we preemptively capitulate.
If money is speech, it becomes the ONLY speech.