• rustyricotta@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    But they’ll implement a one time fee to change your dpi, and then a few years after that it’ll be subscription.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The problem is that companies talk to two sets of people and they both want to hear different things.

    Users, who want to hear that they’re making a new mouse that costs $5 and lasts forever and gives you a blowjob, and shareholders, who want a $50 a month subscription mouse that harvests the users organs while they’re at it.

    And it’s the CEO’s job to keep both of those people just unhappy enough to stick around.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      i think users just want a functioning mouse that doesn’t fall apart in months.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is like the lover who says “wouldn’t it be crazy if you and me had a threesome with your best friend”? Then claims not to be serious when the idea is rejected.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    So it sounds like they did have plans, or at least ideas, for it but are now backtracking after the 100% deserved backlash.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      They were just throwing it out to gauge reaction. They won’t give up on the idea just yet.

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      every company brainstorms at some point and come up with a few good and a lot of bad ideas;

      it doesn’t make it any closer to being a reality, the only difference is that this was made public.

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        They were running it by to see if the host will accept the parasite. They will be back folks

        • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          We have subscription services in cars now.

          I’m betting it’ll happen either way.

          It’s a fucking stupid future.

              • seang96@spgrn.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                Looks like tesla offers a premium subscription for most things and a separate one for the fancy cruise control… So I assume you have an old model or your being a troll?

            • AntY@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              And this is one reason why I hate modern cars. But then again, there’s no alternative, and that sucks.

                • AntY@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Maybe for now, but there’s fewer and fewer around. In ten-twenty years time it will be hard to find a 90s car with reasonable mileage.

          • frunch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Exactly–and someone had to make the unpopular decision to announce it and weather the first round of criticisms. They also will be the first to profit from said stupid idea when they roll it out and the dumbs line up to buy it for fomo reasons or whatever

    • HRDS_654@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      The new CEO had the beginning of an idea in an interview. The interviewer tried to push back while still keeping the interview going, but it became messy real quick.

      • DxK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Same thing happened earlier this year with Wendy’s new CEO. His brilliant plan to make a name for himself was rolling out dynamic pricing. After days of well deserved backlash Wendy’s had to come out and walk it back while insisting they had never planned to use this to do lunch/dinner surge pricing.

        • pirat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Isn’t that what pizzerias and such often do, though, to get more customers in throughout the day? Where I live, a pizza for lunch is often like 20-40% cheaper than a pizza for dinner, and I think that’s actually alright.

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        If that’s the new CEO’s first idea, good luck, Logitech.

        Patel: I’m going to ask this very directly. Can you envision a subscription mouse?

        Faber: Possibly.

        • HRDS_654@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It was so bad Nilay Patel had to apologize (semi-seriously) about causing a news cycle about a mouse.

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Still 1000% have those plans, they are just going to get quiet about them externally for a bit longer now.

  • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    “no plans” We’re just awfully close and intend to make plans. Fucking hate when CEOs talk, can’t believe anything at face value. Lying sacks of shit.

  • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Logitech, buy one of the three tiers based on your needs. 10 clicks a day, 15 clicks a day, or unlimited daily click.

    Disclaimer: right click or scroll wheel not included, please purchase add-on package

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          You just burn your hands out faster with the higher numbers of up/down motions to get the work done.

          • bellsDoSing@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Have you ever learned about the following in VIM:

            • H, M, L, 22H, …,: vertical cursor placement
            • zt, z0, zb: vertical scroll positioning
            • 0, $, gm, gM: horizontal cursor placement
            • w, e, b: word based cursor movement

            Simply holding j or k at times also works, even more so with a decently high key repeat rate.

            Of course there’s a lot more: https://vimhelp.org/motion.txt.html

            The trick is to only learn a couple new movement mappings at a time and use them during one’s workflow for a while, up until they feel ingrained. Then repeat, iteratively building up one’s movement skills in VIM.

            One can say many things about VIM, but not that learning it’s movement mappings will make your required APM (let alone mouse clicks) go up to “get stuff done”. Honestly, once a basic set of these movements has been learned, any other editor without them will feel like a drag.

    • solarvector@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Logitech mice always get better with age, they give you extra clicks for free with each touch of the button!

  • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I highly recommend the Decoder podcast from The Verge. The host Nilay Patel interviews the Logitech CEO Hanneke Faber and this comes up. He comes at the question earnestly but can’t understand how she tries to justify this. It’s a pretty fun listen. Link: https://www.theverge.com/24206847/logitech-ceo-hanneke-faber-mouse-keyboard-gaming-decoder-podcast-interview

    The transcript is there too if you just want to read it. Here’s some of the relavent bits.

    What made the mouse a forever mouse?

    It was a little heavier, it had great software and services that you’d constantly update, and it was beautiful. So I don’t think we’re necessarily super far away from that.

    But, again, I just come back to the cost. You sell me the mouse once. Maybe I’ll pay 200 bucks for it.

    The business model obviously is the challenge there. So then software is even more important when you think about it. Can you come up with a service model? In our video conferencing business, that is now a very important part of the model, the services, and it’s critical for corporate customers.

    Let’s come to that in a second because that makes sense to me. You sell managed services to enterprises. You price support contracts for cameras and whatever. That’s an ongoing need businesses have. I’m still stuck on, “You’re going to sell me a mouse once and it’s going to have ongoing software updates forever.”

    Imagine it’s like your Rolex. You’re going to really love that.

    But Rolex has to employ software engineers to ship me over-the-air updates forever.

    But the artifact is like your Rolex, and then given that we know the technology that we attach to changes, it’s not going to be like your Rolex in that it doesn’t have to ever change. Our stuff will have to change, but does the hardware have to change? I’m not so sure. We’ll have to obviously fix it and figure out what that business model is. We’re not at the forever mouse today, but I’m intrigued by the thought.>

    I’m going to ask this very directly. Can you envision a subscription mouse?

    Possibly.

    And that would be the forever mouse?

    Yeah.

    So you pay a subscription for software updates to your mouse.

    Yeah, and you never have to worry about it again, which is not unlike our video conferencing services today.

    But it’s a mouse.

    But it’s a mouse, yeah.

    I think consumers might perceive those to be very different.

    [Laughs] Yes, but it’s gorgeous. Think about it like a diamond-encrusted mouse.

    • borth@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      “Yeah, and you never have to worry about it again”, in regards to paying for updates. Just set it to auto pay and never worry about it again 🤑

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Logi CEO: “Heh, yeah, well you know, there is a rich tradition of tech companies pranking the public with silly, unexpected practical jokes on April 1.”

    “But sir, it’s August.”

    “Oh, well I guess that’s what makes it so unexpected, heh. Yeah. Unless you want a mouse subscription? No? Oh, just forget that I asked - that was, ah, part of the joke. Apr- August Fools!”