except that’s literally always the excuse. i don’t remember any company coming out and saying “yeah it was a corporate decision to steal designs to cut corners”. literally always either a former employee or an employee who has been promptly fired.
and that’s how you know it didn’t even occur to him. he just did it for the sake of cruelty.
probably because he looks like he’s one of these guys
yeah what’s even the difference between exterminating minorities and giving laborers ownership of the means of production anyway
it went wrong when he asked a question and answered with probably.
it would instead go straight to THE RADICAL LEFT WANTS ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS TO BASH AMERICAN CITIZENS or something
there’s no room for questions or probabilities in fascism, things need to be certain, binary, simple, and scary.
it’s just people with no skills and all resentment.
it’s funny that some people think programming has a human element that can’t be replaced but art doesn’t.
I knew someone would make this comment but that’s kind of the point. rc cars are toys after all, and it’s fine as a hobby but if professional driving would be better with twin sticks I feel like motorsports would have already adopted it.
that’s a bad interpretation.
and to your words:
Nowhere do I say “designers should write code”.
except for literally the very previous sentence. of course you don’t realize that because you somehow assumed I’m a dev despite my comments being entirely about design and even implying that I don’t even know how the fuck git works
Are we on the same page now?
clearly not
so the comment is about how I might not realize that creating such a platform is hard when my comment says I don’t even understand how git works. weird. nowhere in the history of language has “there should be such a thing” meant or even implied “making such a thing is easy”, if anything it implies the opposite.
genius reply. i love that in the same comment where you say devs can’t be design gods you say designers should make an entire software platform.
and no, they’re not supposed to be design gods, which is why I said there should be a platform that enables designers to contribute, which would take the burden off the devs. words must be hard.
dude if your ui is unusable you’re gonna hear about it.
you can’t make an open source car that has two joysticks instead of a steering wheel and talk about industry standards and vendor lock ins when people say it sucks.
I mean it’s cool that it exists for non drivers who sometimes want to jump on an open source car for a quick trip but if driving is your job then the joysticks being technically functional won’t cut it.
that doesn’t mean you have to copy everything 1:1, if people are looking for alternatives one reason might be that not everything about the standard car is great. affinity has some great differences in tools but they’re designed in a way that makes sense to pro users.
I’ve said this before but there’s a severe lack of designers in the open source space. there should be a platform that enables designers to relatively easily contribute to open source projects without learning git or whatever the fuck.
I don’t think any of these people know what “smart” is supposed to mean cause these must be the dumbest ideas for any product I’ve heard so far.
we need more players 2. where’s Tails, Diddy, Lance, Jimmy, Ken… Insert coin already.
4x4 bingo?
you might find things other than loose change behind the cushions when there’s a couchfucker on the loose.
while vance is vp? ew, no
it was a joke about O’Reilly, which is also the name of this cunt