Well yeah. He’s a shilling, narcissistic, crass, foolish, idiotic, small, decrepit, abusive, asshole who refuses to acknowledge his own significant shortfalls, causes boundless issues for everyone involved with him, and is fundamentally a horrible human being who has somehow managed to survive this long despite being a moron.
If you read the article, you’ll see he said it in private which has nothing to do with public statements. But, why read the article when you can write something right off the headline, right?
I’m very sure she’s called him worse
There’s a difference between pointing out vile thugs someone does and calling them a slur.
havent we all?
[citation needed]
Source.
WTF is rationalwiki?
Other than consistently, absolutely, and sometimes subtly hilarious?
Kind of an equal-and-opposite response to Andrew Schlafly’s Conservapedia project. Their mission statement is clearly outlined on the front page:
They are very sure.
Plenty of people are saying. They come to me with tears in their eyes and say.
They’re not just sure, they’re Internet sure!
Why are you sure? What info do you have that says she talks about him in this way?
I suspect OP is just saying that she’s probably called him much worse in private, because a lot of us have done that lol
Press X to doubt…🙄
Many of us probably have and we shouldn’t project that on Harris without some actual evidence to back it up.
That is fair
Well yeah. He’s a shilling, narcissistic, crass, foolish, idiotic, small, decrepit, abusive, asshole who refuses to acknowledge his own significant shortfalls, causes boundless issues for everyone involved with him, and is fundamentally a horrible human being who has somehow managed to survive this long despite being a moron.
lol, “dogpile! get ur lemmy dogpile! Step right up!”
Source: trust me, bro!
Oh, that’s right. I forgot that being called “weird” is, like, the worst thing you can say about someone.
Wait no, I think your statement is weird…
If you read the article, you’ll see he said it in private which has nothing to do with public statements. But, why read the article when you can write something right off the headline, right?
Umm, I have no clue what you’re trying to say. I know what happened, I read the stupid article.
What a weird argument for you to make, though, being that it’s entirely irrelevant. And, you know, weird.
You’re taking a stupid issue more stupid, like others of you ilk.
If you don’t think politicians, including Harris, call each other names including swearing in private, then take the next train to LA LA Land.