• FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Well I’m not American, I’m talking about my own country when I say no taxation without representation.

    You understand this is a post about American politics?

    In any case,

    Where are you going to draw the line? Neonatals literally cannot do anything other than eat, sleep and look around at a blurry world. Do they get a vote?

    What about toddlers? Who might be able to buy something with their parent’s money?

    You’re going to have to set the line somewhere, and there’s going to be people disenfranchised. It’s that simple.

    The age of majority, whatever that is in your country is usually the simplest and least offensive way to do it.

    • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      The minute a baby pops out of the womb, it has the right to vote. It will not be able to exercise that right until it can hold a pencil, but it theoretically has the right, and it can vote as soon as it’s decided it wants to participate in politics.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        When you say “hold a pencil”…. Do you mean simply holding it? Can some one help put it in their hand?

        Do they have to scribble be able to scribble something? Can some one help with that?

        What about the very old people who need some help with the pencil?

        And this is ignoring the fact that a baby obviously cannot understand the implications of voting.

        Same too with a toddler (most of whom can in fact “hold a pencil”

        Edit, this is also ignoring the simple fact that children are represented; they simply cannot choose that representation.