Yup.

  • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Very annoying that they had to take out any mention of the DoJ, but better than nothing. Maybe. We’ll see

    • mad_asshatter@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      He was SCOTUS-ly ruled to be able to use DOJ as an ‘official’ act bc he was President when that occurred.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t think they’d gone ahead with the superseding indictment if they didn’t still think they had a case. These are smart people, and they’re federal prosecutors who generally hate trying anything they won’t likely win.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        They are some of the best prosecutors on the planet. They know how to make a case stick… according to the law.

        The problem is that we have a corrupt organization that is actively changing the law to protect trump. So… time will tell with whether this sticks or if we get another ruling that protects trump.