Alpha71@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoLadies and Gentlemen, the sate of AI.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square109fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageLadies and Gentlemen, the sate of AI.lemmy.worldAlpha71@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square109fedilink
minus-squareSorse@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 months agoRX 7900 XTX is better because it has more x
minus-squareSynapse@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 months agoThat’s 50% more Xs ! You can beat this deal !
minus-squareOptional@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 months agoThis bad boy can fit so many X’s in it
minus-squareSynapse@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 months agoOut of all the marketing letters (E, G, I, R, T and X) X is definitely the betterest!
minus-squareAtHeartEngineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 months agoThat X is twice as much vram, which funny enough, is great for running ai models
minus-squareunexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 months ago“Thanks Steve.”
minus-squarekescusay@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 months agoThe best thing about this is that it’s also on the x-axis.
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 months agoAnd they validated this data 4 times. It’s really good data.
minus-squareprayer@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 months agoActually, they only validated up to 4xs in the product name, so take the 5x result with a grain of salt, one of the Xs aren’t validated.
minus-squarestebo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 months agothis would’ve been better if they asked an LLM how many x’s each of those contained
minus-squaresugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 months agoMy question is, is X better than XTX? XTX has more Xs, but X has only Xs. I think I need AI to solve this quandary.
minus-squareEngineerGaming@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 months agoBut X is bad, as proved by Elon Musk - so it should be the other way around.
minus-squareRubanski@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 months agoBut what about the xXx_RX_7900_xXx?
minus-squaresuperkret@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 months agoX is deprecated. Use the RWayland 7900 WaylandTWayland instead.
RX 7900 XTX is better because it has more x
That’s 50% more Xs ! You can beat this deal !
This bad boy can fit so many X’s in it
Out of all the marketing letters (E, G, I, R, T and X) X is definitely the betterest!
That X is twice as much vram, which funny enough, is great for running ai models
“Thanks Steve.”
The best thing about this is that it’s also on the x-axis.
And they validated this data 4 times. It’s really good data.
Actually, they only validated up to 4xs in the product name, so take the 5x result with a grain of salt, one of the Xs aren’t validated.
this would’ve been better if they asked an LLM how many x’s each of those contained
My question is, is X better than XTX? XTX has more Xs, but X has only Xs. I think I need AI to solve this quandary.
But X is bad, as proved by Elon Musk - so it should be the other way around.
But what about the xXx_RX_7900_xXx?
xXx_RX_790042069_xXx
X is deprecated. Use the RWayland 7900 WaylandTWayland instead.