But the article is talking about what was aired, and now you’re moving the goal posts requiring me to hunt around their website.
It’s fine, I don’t want to really defend them as they’ve done plenty to defend trump. But to talk down to me with the “what don’t you get?” When you’re just floundering all over the place,talking about things the article is not about, seems quite misplaced.
They’ve SINCE edited it out, what don’t you get?
From the article, it says this clip was aired after the original interview.
And this clip isn’t on their website in this format anymore
But the article is talking about what was aired, and now you’re moving the goal posts requiring me to hunt around their website.
It’s fine, I don’t want to really defend them as they’ve done plenty to defend trump. But to talk down to me with the “what don’t you get?” When you’re just floundering all over the place,talking about things the article is not about, seems quite misplaced.
It’s the same goalposts as the original article