Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 8 months agoDonald Trump Overtakes Kamala Harris in Seven-Point Swing Nationally: Pollwww.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square111fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkDonald Trump Overtakes Kamala Harris in Seven-Point Swing Nationally: Pollwww.newsweek.comSocialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 8 months agomessage-square111fedilink
minus-squarejordanlund@lemmy.worldshieldMlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·8 months agoReddit bans everyone though, that’s not a good marker. ;) From a modding perspective, I look at it like this: “Would this link be allowed if it were anyone OTHER than Monk posting it?” Yes? It stays. I’m sorry you don’t like it, but it’s a valid link from a valid source.
minus-squarepooperNickel@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·8 months agoYeah, I don’t really understand the idea that a long history of a certain type of toxic behavior doesn’t count for anything. I think it should.
minus-squareBlackbeard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·8 months agoI could be wrong, but I don’t think anyone’s complaining about the articles.
minus-squarejordanlund@lemmy.worldshieldMlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·8 months agoOh, we get reports on the articles themselves ALL THE TIME.
minus-squareBlackbeard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·8 months agoRight, but is the report about the link/article or the person submitting it? If it’s reported for anything under rules 3 or 4 I’d argue we all know damn well it’s not Newsweek that’s being reported.
minus-squareAmbiguousProps@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·8 months agoThe point is that the user themselves is toxic to have here, especially during an election season.
Reddit bans everyone though, that’s not a good marker. ;)
From a modding perspective, I look at it like this:
“Would this link be allowed if it were anyone OTHER than Monk posting it?”
Yes? It stays. I’m sorry you don’t like it, but it’s a valid link from a valid source.
Yeah, I don’t really understand the idea that a long history of a certain type of toxic behavior doesn’t count for anything. I think it should.
I could be wrong, but I don’t think anyone’s complaining about the articles.
Oh, we get reports on the articles themselves ALL THE TIME.
Right, but is the report about the link/article or the person submitting it? If it’s reported for anything under rules 3 or 4 I’d argue we all know damn well it’s not Newsweek that’s being reported.
The point is that the user themselves is toxic to have here, especially during an election season.