Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years agoDonald Trump Overtakes Kamala Harris in Seven-Point Swing Nationally: Pollwww.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square111linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkDonald Trump Overtakes Kamala Harris in Seven-Point Swing Nationally: Pollwww.newsweek.comSocialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square111linkfedilink
minus-squarejordanlund@lemmy.worldshieldMlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoReddit bans everyone though, that’s not a good marker. ;) From a modding perspective, I look at it like this: “Would this link be allowed if it were anyone OTHER than Monk posting it?” Yes? It stays. I’m sorry you don’t like it, but it’s a valid link from a valid source.
minus-squarepooperNickel@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoYeah, I don’t really understand the idea that a long history of a certain type of toxic behavior doesn’t count for anything. I think it should.
minus-squareBlackbeard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoI could be wrong, but I don’t think anyone’s complaining about the articles.
minus-squarejordanlund@lemmy.worldshieldMlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoOh, we get reports on the articles themselves ALL THE TIME.
minus-squareBlackbeard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoRight, but is the report about the link/article or the person submitting it? If it’s reported for anything under rules 3 or 4 I’d argue we all know damn well it’s not Newsweek that’s being reported.
minus-squareAmbiguousProps@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoThe point is that the user themselves is toxic to have here, especially during an election season.
Reddit bans everyone though, that’s not a good marker. ;)
From a modding perspective, I look at it like this:
“Would this link be allowed if it were anyone OTHER than Monk posting it?”
Yes? It stays. I’m sorry you don’t like it, but it’s a valid link from a valid source.
Yeah, I don’t really understand the idea that a long history of a certain type of toxic behavior doesn’t count for anything. I think it should.
I could be wrong, but I don’t think anyone’s complaining about the articles.
Oh, we get reports on the articles themselves ALL THE TIME.
Right, but is the report about the link/article or the person submitting it? If it’s reported for anything under rules 3 or 4 I’d argue we all know damn well it’s not Newsweek that’s being reported.
The point is that the user themselves is toxic to have here, especially during an election season.