• Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Water is, in fact, not wet. Like any liquid, it can only make wet what it touches/soaks. Wetness is a property bestowed upon other things (primarily solid objects) which come into contact with a liquid, but not the liquid itself.

    And, no, adding water to water doesn’t result in “wet” water- just more water.

    This is just an assertion that wetness is a property only bestowed on solids. There is no reason given for this, and I have no basis to believe that it is true based on the aforementioned linguistics.

    I refer you to the top comment: a very common English expression that “water is wet.”

    • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      You’re looking for logic in human linguistics. That is your mistake.

      It is what it is, and it’s simply for you to either accept or have a lack of acceptance. But that’s what witness is, regardless of your counter arguments.

        • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          No. But you’re clearly

          Sealioning

          Sealioning (also sea-lioning and sea lioning) is a type of trolling or harassmentthat consists of pursuing people with relentless requests for evidence, often tangential or previously addressed, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity (“I’m just trying to have a debate”), and feigning ignorance of the subject matter.[1][2][3][4] It may take the form of “incessant, bad-faith invitations to engage in debate”,[5]and has been likened to a  denial-of-service attack targeted at human beings.[6] The term originated with a 2014 strip of the webcomicWondermark by David Malki,[7] which The Independent called “the most apt description of Twitter you’ll ever see”.[8]

      • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Nice edit.

        How dare I be pedantic when you were doing it first LMAO!

        It seems like if it were true you’d have an actual reason instead of calling me irrational. I guess that’s just how it is though.

        You sure got big mad for me asking you to explain your pedantry though. Probably because you know I’m right, huh?

        • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          I am not beholden to your standards. It’s a simple fact, which I explained clearly, and you are obviously struggling to accept that fact.

          That is not my responsibility, nor is my problem.

            • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              At least you were able to admit that you’re mistaken. But blaming others for your own unwillingness/inability to accept facts is irrational.

              • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                Ooh, facts?

                Then you must have a source that explains how water is not wet? Why don’t we go there then?

                Because all I’ve seen is you pretending like you can assert whatever you want without a reason.

                • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I pity you for how much you are struggling to accept this.

                  I’ve already explained it, and you chose to ignore that. Again, not my fault or responsibility, but yours.

                  I wish you all the best luck in your struggles.