• tsugu@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    You act as if Snap was bad in any way. Proprietary backend does not equal bad.

    Edit: Most people don’t care about FOSS vs proprietary. And the snap client is FOSS anyways, plus it’s capable of installing snaps from local files.

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I will not use a system with snap and has nothing to do with being proprietary.

      One of the reasons that I could not use Ubuntu is that I cannot control using snap or not. They even use it to install apps that you install via apt.

      The fact that the only time I did use a system with snap left me with the impression that it is an absolute performance pig certainly does not help.

      • tsugu@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I disagree for many reasons, but I realize that nobody on Lemmy really gives a shit since people here react to anything that even smells of proprietary as if it was radioactive.

          • tsugu@slrpnk.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Firefox is literally not in Ubuntu’s repos anymore. They didn’t want to maintain it as Mozilla agreed to just make the Snap version that works across all Ubuntu versions and anywhere else.

            What should the command do? Just fail? Instead it clearly tells you it’s downloading the snap of Firefox.

            In fact if it was up to me I would just get rid of most GUI apps from the repos that have a snap/flatpak equivalent.