• m_f@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The advantage of the Fediverse is exactly that, that each instance can decide if they federate or not. The thing that I’m wary of is a renewal of Embrace, extend, and extinguish. I’d like to think that Zuckerberg isn’t going to try playing dirty tricks, but we’ll see what happens if and when Threads ever becomes really successful.

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      EEE would require existing Mastodon users moving to threads which I can’t see happening

      • shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        EEE would require existing Mastodon users moving to threads

        It would not.

        Meta could implement ActivityPub in Facebook, and there’s your majority population. Imagine a Facebook user “friending” your mastodon account. You follow them back because it’s your mom, and so does basically everyone. Next, Facebook implements Pages to round off the concept of “communities.” Then, Facebook introduces a genuinely useful extension - marketplace. Once a decent clip of people set up shop, trim off any instances that don’t adopt the FriendlyPub fork.

        Bam, EEE.

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      If you and others don’t like Threads to begin with then why would the “extinguish” part ever work? The people who are already here aren’t going to stop just because Threads federates and then later on unfederates.

      • m_f@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I won’t use threads, but the Fediverse is relatively small. It would suck if they managed to play dirty tricks and steal a large fraction of current fediverse users.