Summary

The House GOP’s new rules package aims to weaken minority party influence while advancing a pro-corporate agenda.

Key provisions include shielding the House speaker from bipartisan accountability and fast-tracking 12 GOP bills without allowing amendments, including measures to sanction the International Criminal Court (ICC) and protect fracking.

Democrats, led by Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), criticized the package for ignoring economic and social issues like inflation and housing while prioritizing tax cuts for billionaires.

Republicans plan to offset these costs by slashing social programs, sparking warnings of further congressional dysfunction.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      How are they not fair?

      Just because the majority of people who actually show up and vote in them pick candidates you don’t like?

      It’s the people who bother to fucking show up that make the difference.

      • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        2016

        On July 22, WikiLeaks published the Democratic National Committee email leak, in which DNC operatives seemed to deride Bernie Sanders’ campaign and discuss ways to advance Clinton’s nomination, leading to the resignation of DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz and other implicated officials.

        2024

        The primaries in Florida and Delaware were cancelled, with Biden receiving all pledged delegates, while in North Carolina, Tennessee, Mississippi, and Indiana, no candidates other than Biden will appear on the ballot, partially due to decisions by the state Democratic parties in those states.

        It’s the people who bother to fucking show up that make the difference.

        I assume you’re not talking about the 6 states listed where the DNC chose to run Biden unopposed or simply cancelled the primary altogether. After all, can’t show up for the primary if there is no primary.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          If 100% of those states had gone for Biden, it wouldn’t have changed the nomination. He already had it locked in.

          And the 2016 scheme was to have the superdelegates tip the scales to Clinton if Bernie narrowly won the primaries, but he didn’t.

            • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Hillary received the majority of the votes in the primaries. If the superdelegates had changed their votes to support Bernie instead, that would have been undemocratic.

              Biden had a mathematically insurmountable lead when the primaries were canceled.

              • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                So if it hadn’t gone their way, they would have made it go their way. They had a plan ready to go to disregard the voters and install the candidate they had hand picked. And you’re defending that as fair and democratic.