Checks the room… Uhhh polls extremely well just like Kamala did.
When you push forward a nonviable candidate and insist voters love them, you don’t then get to blame the same voters for not voting for them, especially when they keep telling you “we don’t want him”
And no, better them Trump is not a good enough reason to vote for him (if you get to vote at all, let’s not kid ourselves and pretend elections will happen like normal).
I think you misunderstand statistics and polls. You shouldnt be making conclusions based on them. All you are saying is you want the most likely chance to be “right”.
And if we haven’t made any significant headway on that front for the past century, how exactly do you plan to do that in the current election cycle? What method of changing minds are you planning to use to accomplish that?
An imperfect plan today beats a perfect plan 10 years from now. Slowing down is better than speeding up.
You missed the point entirely. The polls all but guaranteed Kamala would win, but we we’re very vocally telling you we weren’t voting for her, she was a nonviable candidate. The polls mislead you and instead of acknowledging that she didn’t win because she wasn’t a popular choice, you blamed people who didn’t vote for her and she adopting the same losing strategy.
The polls are misleading, speak to real people, they don’t want Newsom. When you insist on him being the candidate because of the polls conducted by capitalist organizations, he still won’t win because the people are rejecting genocide supporting right wing candidates that spent years warning us about Trump and the best they can do is crack weak jokes at him.
Newsom is not your friend, insist on a viable candidate.
Your party could’ve put up a viable candidate instead of a senile old man and a cop. It’s squarely on you that you can’t win elections, not on people who won’t vote for someone as thoroughly unelectable as blue presidential candidates
Nope, but he’s popular and polls extremely well.
Checks the room… Uhhh polls extremely well just like Kamala did.
When you push forward a nonviable candidate and insist voters love them, you don’t then get to blame the same voters for not voting for them, especially when they keep telling you “we don’t want him”
And no, better them Trump is not a good enough reason to vote for him (if you get to vote at all, let’s not kid ourselves and pretend elections will happen like normal).
Okay I’ll vote for someone who polls poorly. Seems like a winning strategy.
I think you misunderstand statistics and polls. You shouldnt be making conclusions based on them. All you are saying is you want the most likely chance to be “right”.
They’re probably like me and just want the most likely chance to “decelerate the frantic march of fascism”.
deceleration is not enough by a country mile.
Gotta slow down before you stop. Once we’re stopped, then we can talk about reversing course. You ever try to pull a u-turn without slowing down?
Thats not how changing minds works.
And if we haven’t made any significant headway on that front for the past century, how exactly do you plan to do that in the current election cycle? What method of changing minds are you planning to use to accomplish that?
An imperfect plan today beats a perfect plan 10 years from now. Slowing down is better than speeding up.
You missed the point entirely. The polls all but guaranteed Kamala would win, but we we’re very vocally telling you we weren’t voting for her, she was a nonviable candidate. The polls mislead you and instead of acknowledging that she didn’t win because she wasn’t a popular choice, you blamed people who didn’t vote for her and she adopting the same losing strategy.
The polls are misleading, speak to real people, they don’t want Newsom. When you insist on him being the candidate because of the polls conducted by capitalist organizations, he still won’t win because the people are rejecting genocide supporting right wing candidates that spent years warning us about Trump and the best they can do is crack weak jokes at him.
Newsom is not your friend, insist on a viable candidate.
Thanks for admitting the current situation is your fault
Your party could’ve put up a viable candidate instead of a senile old man and a cop. It’s squarely on you that you can’t win elections, not on people who won’t vote for someone as thoroughly unelectable as blue presidential candidates