• misk@piefed.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    You’re missing the point.

    Valve can’t enforce prices across other store by mandating they can’t be cheaper because they’re a monopolist. If this part of their agreement is true then they are out of the line, in breach of law, and should be punished. Being a monopoly isn’t illegal, how Valve got there doesn’t matter. Their behaviour as a monopolist matters. It’s literally the law in most civilised countries and those laws come from the times when people didn’t simp for monopolies.

    • deliriousdreams@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Valve can for the keys that they provide. The keys they provide are free. Their agreement only is valid for Steam Keys. Those are freely generated Steam licenses of the game for the game dev to sell on other store fronts. For which the developer gets 100% of profits.

      And steam is not a monopoly. I will not continue to reiterate the legal definition of that.

      • misk@piefed.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Steam keys means everything still happens in their store, with users attached to the platform without a way out. This is not a serious answer.

        Steam is a monopoly because of their massive market share, that’s all there is to it, having irrelevant competition doesn’t matter in this case. You think monopoly = bad and therefore Steam can’t be a monopoly. That’s not how it works.