Trump wants to have a Purge so badly.
But he doesn’t want to participate, and I think he wouldn’t even really watch it from a bunker. Would probably find the violence grotesque and boring.
However, imagine the TV ratings of such an event that he made happen! That’s what really gets this guy hard.
Shit I wouldn’t go after K pop or the Beehive either.
I went from an 07 Escape to a 2023 RAV4. The thing just won’t shut the fuck up. Mike any kinda of parking the detection beeps. Console software is annoying.
Miss my relatively dumb car.
If they are trying to monetize popular NSFW subs they cannot monetize with ads, a paywall would probably just kill the engagement.
If they are trying to compete with OnlyFans and rev share with the sub creator I could maybe see that working.
Awww skeet skeet mutha fuckaaaa
What would you use this feature for?
As a presenter would be mortified.
As an attendee, hilarious.
Sounds like Nevada!
That’s not really Forbes serving the malvertising intentionally. If your site hooks into a programmatic advertising stack, the risk of malware exists. This is from 2016, but it’s mostly true today. If a user is blocking ads and cookies and they disable their ad blocker on a specific site only, there’s little data to know about that user. So you get low $CPM on the bid which is mainly where the malicious ads win bids on actual quality sites. That’s why most top sites are very strict on who can bid nowadays.
Scale. It’s a better quality audience but executives like BIG NUMBERS to make the juice worth the squeeze.
I think the investment supporting is worth it in the long run! Traditional social is basically a shitty rev share to reach a larger audience.
Limited view tickets were $1500 a piece when TS came to Levi stadium. Bonkers
Way bigger scale than I was expecting
What does Hungary stand to gain in a defeat of Ukraine?
What’s the identifier referenced in the IMDB database? Some kind of unique content id?
I think doing that with programmatic ads would be difficult. Maybe hard coding a specific creative would be feasible.
I would like to imagine a world where site advertising was reasonable. Ad blockers don’t exist, sites advertise 1 or 2 banners at $3-5 CPM and everyone gets paid and consumes content in synchrony. It won’t happen. Advertising is setup for ad blocking audiences and iOS cookieless environments. Everyone else subsidizes by viewing the myriad of placements splattered all over the page.
Randos on Twitter left negative comments with little to no substantive feedback. Fire up the article!
Years ago I worked for a company that had ads appear on Breitbart. Retargeted display, not a direct buy on the site. People would screenshot the ads and light up our Twitter complaining we were directly supporting hate speech etc, so we asked our demand partner to stop buying there to avoid negative engagement on our social. If your site gets a critical mass of negative attention brands can shut down your ability to be commercially viable, and effectively censor the content in a way.
Got it so buy a second drive, and pay $15/mo to the cloud storage company.