They have to use this language to stay out of legal trouble. Saying things you know aren’t true is indeed lying, but you have to prove that they know it’s a lie.

Intention to deceive is the key part, and hard to prove. So journalists play it on the safe side and just keep to the facts: they repeated false claims / statements.

I guess I should have been more specific, I apologize. What is the relation to the word “mander” and the topic of the instance?

Maybe not the perfect place to ask, but under topic specific instances, mander is highlighted. What topic is this?

Original article: https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-rallies-blue-states-california-colorado-1965539

Let’s not give Microsoft our clicks, shall we?

Who needs to give their browser access to their camera?

Lmao and I said “that guy”. I blame the low quality picture! XD

That guy looks his parents were Tom Scott and Shayne Topp

If it was a bug, why did he delete his post?

That’s returning it to the seller. In your country there’s implied warranty from the manufacturer and they will have to honor your claims if it is showing defects

Can you not claim warranty / do an RMA?

Lmao what weird projection is this. As a leftist liberal quality manager, I can tell you’re full of shit

I just want the functionality organized in some predictable way and leave me some place to work in

Then customize it. If you’re using Office, it should even be transferred between devices. This is exactly why you can customize it: so you can make your type of work your focus.

I’m not here to defend MS or anything, but I can’t help pointing out the answer right in front of you.

You know you can customize the ribbon entirely, right? Make it your own and put your most used features in there

Oo good to know, thanks for letting us know

Which part isn’t working?

Three dots on a post > filter > filter instance

°C, which is not bad. Official press release (I think): https://global.nissannews.com/en/releases/nissan-trialing-cool-paint-technology

12 degrees on roof, 5 on car seat. It’s in the article

Tell me what the punchline is and I’ll upvote

I don’t think there’s a big problem by using upvotes, downvotes and comments as systems that can show the popularity or controversy of a post.

Imo the bigger problem is in the comments using the same voting system. For starters, everyone the system in a different way. Most notably example is downvoting to disagree.

Secondly, because we are evolutionary wired to try and fit in, you either consciously or subconsciously try to create a comment that will give you the best chances at seeing the numbers go up and receive validation from your peers.

Personally I think the system is fine to keep running under the hood to keep the sorting algorithms available and maybe for moderation purposes, but it would be great if we wouldn’t be able to see them at all as to not be influenced by the connections we make between votes and post content.