Nissan Motor Co. said it has developed a new type of paint that significantly reduces the temperature inside vehicles parked in direct sunlight.

The surface of a car coated with the innovative material remains up to 12 degrees cooler than that of a vehicle with standard paint, tests showed.

The company said the coating material can help rein in the temperature rise not only on the car’s body but also in the vehicle when exposed to direct sunlight.

      • mbtrhcs@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Their privacy policy includes a provision that they can use the cameras and GPS to infer things such as sexual orientation, so yeah.

        • fern@lemmy.autism.place
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          While this fucked up, documenting sexual orientation is not exactly recording sex. Someone could simply use GPS and see that the only place in the area that’s open is the gay bar and infer from that, or even lip reading.

              • Ace@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                so you’re suggesting that it’s feasible to use a video stream from the car to read lips by, what, paying out of pocket to send the video stream over the built-in cellular? Possible, sure. Then receiving it at a datacentre and running one of the most computationally intensive algorithms in existence on the video stream, 24/7? Or at least only when I’m using the car? so the datacentre is processing presumably tens or hundreds of thousands of these all at once, so at let’s say 5mbps per video that could easily be multiple terrabits per second of bandwidth, consuming megawatts of power in order to spy on people in probably the least efficient and most expensive way imaginable, and all to determine that I said I like coke rather than pepsi so the car company can receive $0.01 in selling that to some ad company?

                Is that scenario possible? Yes. Is it happening? I am certain that it’s not in any rational company. The same line of reasoning applies to listening to your phone’s microphone or camera, except there you’d also notice your phone getting hot and the battery dying in an hour or two.

                The GPS thing is feasible. I don’t know if they’re doing that but they could. As soon as you mention transmitting video feeds or cloud AI you’re in conspiracy territory.

                ||Now, Tesla’s on-device AI processing using the driver’s power bill to analyse video on-site and only send the tiny results into the cloud… is very different. ||

          • mbtrhcs@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            I don’t think they have interior cameras (although other manufacturers do), but the front and backup camera feeds provide plenty of information as well.

            Then there’s also this, if you need any more reason to be concerned.

            • ABCDE@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              I don’t think they have interior cameras

              Can just stop there. Unless people are banging on the bonnet, not sure what the point is.

              • mbtrhcs@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                If you read the linked article you will find that exterior cameras feeds are plenty invasive enough.

                • ABCDE@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I don’t disagree, but this is what was said:

                  Nissan also detects you having sex in the car

                  Unless there are cameras in the car then no.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        There’s a very long list of two door sports cars I’d buy instead of one of those bloated excuses.

        • Psythik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’d like to see that list, cause I’m I’m considering selling the car in a year or two. Requirements: 2 doors, convertable, 300+ BHP, manual transmission, stability control (cause I’m a bad driver lol), under $15K.

      • callouscomic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I mean, if you’re a middle age bro with a retail supervisor job compensating to show off to teen girls, I guess.

        • Psythik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I see, thanks for pointing out that I’m a stereotype. FML

          TBF, the 350Z was the sports car to have when I was a teenager. Not my fault that I can only afford one just now in my mid-30s, haha. I blame Ronald Regan for screwing over working-class citizens. If I had the money my parents had, I’d be driving an EV by now.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I had a 370Z. Basically the same chassis with a bigger engine.

        Feels like sitting in a bathtub. It’s got a heavy ass flywheel that makes the V6 feel as smooth as a V8, but with predictable effects on responsiveness. You can cut the fly weight in half and it’s still perfectly good to run on the street without issues.

        I traded it in for an Miata NC and never looked back. Sure, the Z has more power, but it doesn’t make good use of it the way a Miata does.

        • Psythik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Funny you mention that; I had the opportunity to buy an ND Miata for $5K more. Went with the 350Z instead. Now your comment is making me second guess myself, even though I love how the 350 handles.

          It glides through corners so damn well, I can’t possibly imagine it getting any better than this, but you “Miata is always the answer” people always come of the woodwork and make me second guess my decision. The low horsepower figures always got to me. But now I’m thinking that maybe I should have just taken the damn test drive before falling in love with the Z.

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    12 degrees? I guess that’s cool but still well within egg frying temperature around here.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Twelve degrees what? A degree Celsius is more than twice a degree in Fahrenheit.

    State your units, FFS.

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    up to 12 degrees cooler

    okay but why? What tangible difference is that going to make?

    Also is this on the interior or exterior?

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Hello and welcome. The purpose of this forum is for people to share articles, and then discuss the contents of the article they just read. If that’s not what you’re here to do, please spend your time elsewhere.

          • helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            LOL I’ve been here for years, I don’t need a welcome, but I appreciate the sentiment.

            I will spend my time when and how I choose, thanks so much, have a nice day!

        • Drusas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Asahi is perfectly legitimate and one of Japan’s largest news organizations.

          Just because you haven’t heard of something doesn’t mean there’s anything wrong with it.

    • herrvogel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      They found a very interesting way of selling their hybrid cars as full on EVs where I live. Their e-power stuff are small ICEs working as generators for electric motors that then drive the wheels. Apparently the fact that the wheels get all their power from an electric motor makes it definitely not a hybrid no sir, despite the fact the cars have tiny ass batteries and the single source of power for the whole system is the ICE. Also they somehow have worse fuel efficiency than many contemporary ICEs that cost quite a bit less. I don’t understand Nissan.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        A few car companies seem to be doing that. Toyota(?) here are advertising their hybrid vehicles as “self-charging electric vehicles” instead of a hybrid, even though there’s no way to plug them in and not have them self charge.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        great video. Its wild that it is functioning as an IR emitter and just beaming things into space.

    • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Probably yes, but it may not actually be doable. Not just because of how much there is to paint, but because the energy doesn’t just evaporate. It’s got to go somewhere. In this case I’m assuming it’s reflected, even if diffused. If everything does this, things that don’t (people, cars, pets, etc) will get all that extra energy.

      Wouldn’t want to end up in a situation like this: https://www.businessinsider.com/death-ray-skyscraper-is-wreaking-havoc-on-london-for-a-few-totally-insane-reasons-2015-7

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Oh great so now the rest of the universe has to deal with it. Really just kicking the can aren’t we

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The amount of folks who have melted their shitty low quality thermoplastic patio furniture with their sliding glass windows will always amuse me, but overall I don’t consider IR radiation to be a big problem. Using a bunch of VOCs to paint everything and pollute a city would be though.

        • Sir_Fridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          You ever seen that curved building that focused the sunlight into a spot in front of it and melted cars? Lol

      • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Ultimately, they can be, but there’s lots of differences between them once they reach the bucket you buy. They have different adhesion qualities, but that could be addressed with an appropriate primer. They have different final finish surface requirements, which could be an issue for how the paint works. I remember seeing dragonfly-wing-style paint that was white when viewed perfectly straight buy blue when viewed at any off angle due to a microscopic vertical grid of blue walls. There may also be a required clearcoat component that may not be compatible between the two surfaces. Metal paint is also designed to handle the flex of metal where as concrete paint would barely be concerned about that but possible address crumbling instead.

        Edit: and after reading the article, it’s a radiative-cooling paint rather than a reflecting coating. Concrete has a much lower thermal conductivity so this may not be effective in transferring heat out of the concrete.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Metal paint is concrete paint. Microsoft paint is abstract paint. This comment is metaphorical paint.

  • marx2k@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    As someone living in Wisconsin with salty road winters, I’ll say that Nissan’s reputation is mostly trash here based specifically on their paint

    • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s staggering to me the number of black cars being sold in hot countries like Australia. Not to mention just how hard they are to see against the background of a bitumen road.

      • daddy32@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        In some countries, you get a penalty on insurance depending on the car color, with maximum penalty reserved for black cars.

        • Kuma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          How is it with silver and grey? Do you get a heavy penalty for them too? If it rains, snow and/or are foggy can it be very tricky to see silver and grey cars.

            • boatswain@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              Growing up I remember hearing that red cars were the most expensive for insurance, as owners of red cars had the highest incidence of speeding and dangerous driving.

          • daddy32@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Lol. Wouldn’t want to see that applied to people although I can imagine the rhetoric.

    • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is because the substance artificially reproduces a process known as radiative cooling on the painted surface. A typical example of radiative cooling is a phenomenon where the ground releases heat to cool off.

      Nissan worked with the Chinese enterprise Radi-Cool as it specializes in the creation of radiative cooling technologies and materials.

      (…)

      However, one obstacle remains: the paint is six times thicker than the usual coating on the car body surface. The substance is also more expensive, which would add to the total cost of a new vehicle.

      That, in turn, makes it difficult for the coating material to be utilized for mass-produced passenger automobiles.

      For this reason, Nissan is looking to commercialize the paint on ambulances and other specialized vehicles as the first step.

      • ace_garp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        …the paint is six times thicker than the usual coating on the car body surface… looking to commercialize the paint on ambulances and other specialized vehicles as the first step.

        This is the best part of the article.

        After driving ambulance during Australian summers, in the Great Victorian Desert, this would assist so much with operating temperatures. A literal life-saver, if the AC ever broke, also.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        However, one obstacle remains: the paint is six times thicker than the usual coating on the car body surface. The substance is also more expensive, which would add to the total cost of a new vehicle.

        That, in turn, makes it difficult for the coating material to be utilized for mass-produced passenger automobiles.

        With 6 times thicker paint there’s a chance it also wouldn’t rust like a proper Nissan and we can’t have that, now can we

          • boonhet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            At the… Ugh idk. They all have super thin paint nowadays. Especially the more expensive brands.