Keep Advent Of Code and Everybody.codes together => More activity in this community, more discoverability for either competitions. Only drawback => polluted feed. Which can be fixed by the tags.

but that’s just a choice whereas in C you have no choice but write flawless code.

Yeah, that way they also get a 3 hour nap

Oops yeah you’re right. Sorry OP. There’s nothing better than using a database that flushes to disk often enough that missing a small chunk of data due to interruptions should be fine. Probably some kind of memory mapped IO on top of eager writing filesystem should do a good enough job.

I thought someone here had mentioned that the environment and user executing the script at startup and you running the script might have differences. The reason it would have worked with systemd might be that the environment was loaded correctly?

Professional code golfers (Is that the right term?) build up a large suite of helper libraries from past events/from daily puzzle solving that they invoke for common problem types like graph search or constraint solving, or even for converting the text input to the right data structures.

I assume the most difficult aspect of the problems is to translate the statements into actual code constraints/filter functions. So the spirit of the competition is not broken by having pre-written code (Although I am not sure many would think pre-written code is acceptable).

On the other hand if the number keeps going down it helps strengthen hope that it can go down to 0. When these things happen some apparatus gets left behind on how to do it a again for rogue actors inside the country too.

Rare Microsoft Win…

Except we shouldn’t be giving corporations same rights as individuals. Doing so leads to corporate feudalism.

Those should be your expectations when you are on the shop floor and that should allow you to reject the purchase if it’s s deal breaker for you. Not when you’re crossing railway tracks.

When it’s been advertised to the user as “full self driving”, is it?

I wouldn’t believe an advertisement.

Jokes on them, I am a grumpy bastard who hates emotionally expressive humans.

As opposed to being bland and boring?

If you need something in a pinch to substitute a tool you memorized, skill issue is a valid excuse to reject Linux.

If a theme is able to break core functionality then your theming system/guidelines needs to be fixed. And it to be more accessible to theme designers so these problems don’t occur in the first place.

If you think anyone can 100% guarantee shit won’t break, I have a bridge to sell you.

If you sign here on this legal paper saying YOU will face consequences for a friday deploy then yes I will take you up on this

Same here. Disabled it a year back.

This is same as feeling bad for people who think others shouldn’t be getting caught in MLM schemes.

I don’t agree with your argument.

Making a human go to prison for wiping out a family of 4 isn’t going to bring back the family of 4. So you’re just using deterrence to hopefully make drivers more cautious.

Yet, year after year… humans cause more deaths by negligence than tools can cause by failing.

The question is definitely “How much safer are they compared to human drivers”

It’s also much easier to prove that the system has those issues fixed compared to training a human hoping that their critical faculties are intact. Rigorous Software testing and mechanical testing are within legislative reach and can be made strict requirements.