I dont think that poor UI programming for dedicated programs is an argument for browser based solutions.

I have issues with poorly programmed UIs in browser based tools all the time.

My uncle. Very smart very neuronal. He knows the entire Internet, can you imagine? the entire internet. Like the mails of Crooked Hillary Clinton, that crook. You know what stands in that Mails? my uncle knows. He makes the best code. The most beautiful code. No one has ever seen code like it, but for him, he’s a genius, like i am, i have inherited all his genius genes. It is very easy. He makes the best code. Sometimes he calls me and asks me: you are even smarter than i am. Can you look at my code?

Note for everyone:

There is three bodies that can start an investigation by the constitutional court to ban a party. The federal government. The federal parliament and the state assembly composed of representatives of the state governments.

The federal government, both outgoing and new one already made it clear they have no intentions to start the procedure.

The federal parliament whose majority coalition forms the government also has only shown lackluster motivation.

It is unlikely that the state of Bremen will manage to get a majority in the state assembly as the majority of state governments is run by the reactionary CDU/CSU and the now right wing and often authoritarian and racist SPD. Also states need to agree on a position for their vote in the state assembly to be considered.

In the current political climate this ia good to do, but there is a long way to success as the majority political powers want to keep the AfD around to secure their position and to justify their own racist ans inhumane policies as “moderate” in comparision.

I mean the world can fix a broken US democracy by boycotting the US entirely on all fronts until a democratic country emerges.

This will take a while though as we have seen with South Africa.

Let me explain you how the Red-Workers-Movement of 1922 in the Oblast-Utbackya had this structural issue in their organization by the theory of famous late 19th century analyst.

People need to start shooting at ICE agents that break into homes. If Judges have their wits about them they’ll throw out any cases against people who defended themselves against the ICE gang breaking in to abduct them or their family.

I hope more hardware manufactures offer to ship without a windows license. It is cheaper for everyone and people have less hassle installing an OS of their choice on the device.

https://www.aljazeera.com/program/newsfeed/2024/5/2/videos-show-violence-of-mob-attack-on-ucla-anti-war-protesters
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/05/16/us/ucla-student-protests-counterprotesters-invs/index.html

This is the kind of shit that Biden endorsed. A violent mob working together with campus police to attack peaceful protest camps. And to put icing on the cake, then some of the peaceful protestors that were brutally attacked got arrested, while the attackers could leave uninterrupted, which further shows that the attackers had the backing of the government.

Biden had absolutely no regard for the rights of people who opposed the Israel crimes he zealously enabled.

EDIT: One of the perpetrators identified by CNN was subsequently released and no charges made, despite his mother proudly boasting about his violent attacks and him being clearly identifiable in videos, as he is beating onto people with a pole.

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/06/21/us/edan-on-ucla-palestine-encampment-attack/index.html

Well, during the term of Joe Biden he attacked these protestors verbally and encouraged local police and fascist MAGA terrorists to attack peaceful protest encampments with physical violence.

The idea that Biden cared in any way about the constitutional or even basic human rights of these protestors is laughable.

Naah. There is plenty of Gen X, Y, Z who know and plenty of Millenials who dont.

Its just if you wanted to “do stuff with computers” you had to develop some understanding back then.

Today you can “do stuff” like gaming much easier out of the box. So not everyone who “does stuff” knows his way around.

In the office most colleagues of all generations just know how to do their specific things, mostly in MS Office products.

Not worrying about system requirements just translates into the game not being sold for your generation of the console, and requiring multiple generations of one console to enjoy both new and old titles.

I agree with the principal sentiment. Except for schizophrenia and other illnesses involving acute psychosis, drugs shouldnt be the permanent solution.

But this requires access to proper psychotherapy, which needs to be part of a consistent concept of slowly reducing the drugs as the condition gets better.

Also this requires a society, where people have enough agency to remove the causes of psychological distress from their life. People getting anxieties is perfectly normal, if they are in constant fear to not be able to pay their bills. People getting depressed is perfectly normal, if they are expected to work a dead end job for the rest of their lifes, etc.

I see none of that coming from the direction of any politician.

EDIT: Wow. People get offended by the idea not to pump people full of drugs for the rest of their lifes, when therapy is a viable alternative. Seriously why do you want people to suffer instead of providing proper healthcare including proper access to therapy and creating life conditions that aren’t designed to make people sick? I never thought this to be controversial.

If he wanted Trump to win, then why wouldnt he endorse Trump? This way he would bring normal Trump/Rep voters, to what, what they usually vote for.

Also it is not plausible that the followers of a literal Nazi leader from an organization that wants to exterminate all brown people would prefer voting for a mixed race women over voting for another Nazi.

And there are a lot of right-of center voters that are on the fence that would back him over Trump- and therefore will support Shill

So he is taking votes away from Trump, helping Harris.

I said he wants to help Harris by harming Stein.

This is painstakenly obvios.

You said Steins goal is to take votes from Harris. So the target audience is potential Harris voters. So the target audience of the “endorsement” would be potential Harris voters. But the guy is a Nazi so he is alienating potential Harris voters from Stein, bringing them back to Harris.

If his target audience would be Trump voters he would also be helping Harris by moving Trump voters from Trump.

Either way Harris wins by this endorsement and this is his intended goal.

You just kept insulting me and making accusations instead of addressing the logical inconsistency in your contradicting claims

So your argument is that any basic logic is a strawman, because you dont want to face the logical contradictions in your statements?

So you think that he beliefs his target audience to be Democrat voters?

Or do you think he wants to siphon off votes of Trump?

Because that would also help Harris, but contradict your statement regarding Stein being there to damage Harris and help Trump.

So you agree that the nazi guy is helping Harris by him alienating progressive voters from Stein.

Then you have to conclude that he is just very very dumb, or you have to agree with my statement, that he wants to harm Stein and help Harris. Which brings the important question, what does the nazi guy gain from helping Harris?

As the guy was leading a large organization, him being dumb is unlikely. Him being good at scheming and manipulating on the other hand is very much on brand.

So you claim Steins goal is to siphon votes away from Harris in order to help Trump.

So the target audience of Stein under that premise are center/progressive voters. The target audience clearly is not Trump voters.

So even if Steins goal is solely to siphon votes from the Dems, any vote that goes to her is a “win” for her. And the opposite, any voter deciding to go back to Harris is a “loss” for her.

Him endorsing Stein is clearly aimed at achieving the latter. You said it yourself,

Stein’s campaign exists solely to harm the democratic nominee

So her target audience are solely potential dem voters. And these are alienated by that endorsement, as is also very clear in this thread.

So there is two options:

A - the guy is a total moron
B - he is achieving exactly what he wants

A seems unlikely to me, as nazi leaders are despicable and evil, but smart and scheming.

Given that more Iraqis were killed by the Clinton era sanctions, crippling food and medicine access for Iraq, as well as the general hawkishness of the Dems, as evident again with Israel today, it wouldn’t have made a difference.

When it comes to invading and murdering brown people, both parties are pretty similar. Heck Hillary Clinton always got a hard on for escalating to war with Iran.