• sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m not a Stein voter, but blaming candidates when other people endorsing them seems odd.

    How about this: “I have sex with farm animals all day long, and on behalf of the farm animal love society, I endorse Kamala Harris!”

    So now should we write news stories about Harris being the bestiality candidate?

    no, right. So why is everyone doing it to Stein?

    …Are you guys listening to me or still think of bestiality?

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Didn’t Richard Spencer endorse Biden in a game of 64D chess as a 5000 IQ play?

    Still either way, Jill’s an Ableist Transphobe on Putin’s payroll and even if she wasn’t, she cannot win a single state under the current Electoral College so she could be literally the second coming of Christ and it wouldn’t matter.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Ok, that’s pretty funny. An endorsement shouldn’t be taken too seriously (given a certain string of endorsements I don’t like for Harris) but it’s still really funny. Fuck Jill Stein.

    • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      And they declined his endorsement: Stein’s campaign says it wants nothing to do with Duke, the former American Nazi Party member

      Stein’s campaign manager, Jason Call, disavowed the endorsement and called Duke “trash.”

  • Wren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Aaaaand there ya go. This is all you need to know about Jill Stein right? Because if Harris is a conservative because of Cheney’s endorsement….

    Or are the rules different?

        • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I was about to say that that isnt really much of an insult these days, given that its not really much different from insulting a republican by calling them “conservative” in some shortened manner and the cold war ended awhile go, but then I saw the username of the person you were replying to.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Source on Harris accepting a David duke endorsement? Else willful misinformation/trolling

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          You should read the comment chain before making non sequitur requests. It was literally two comments long. You couldn’t help but have read it before getting here.

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              I was judgmental for the original comment seeming to be in bad faith, but have an upvote, that was a damn funny response.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The rules are the same. They’re both trash.

      Cornel West 2024. Zero endorsements from republicans and other white supremacists.

      • Wren@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Hey look everyone!

        It’s yet another “third party candidate supporter” that seemingly never says anything at all to ever support their candidate aside from just trashing Harris and Harris alone.

        Trump who? Amirite?

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Stein’s campaign says it wants nothing to do with Duke, the former American Nazi Party member.

      It’s one thing to be endorsed by an undesirable party, it’s another to accept it or even invite them to campaign with you.

      • Wren@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It’s one thing to be the type of person that a racist piece of shit would endorse, and another to be the type of person that a person who fucking hates dictators would endorse.

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Why do you think a literal Nazi would be honest in his public endorsements and not just doing it for tactical reasons?

          Think about it. Trump supporters gonna Trump. This “endorsement” is aimed at harming Steins campaign with moderate and progressive voters, as is evident with the reaction here.

          Now the question is, why he wants to do that, as it helps the Harris campaign. What does he think he gains from helping Harris?

          • Wren@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Holy shit that was funny. You didn’t even read the article, did you?

            Stein’s campaign exists solely to harm the democratic nominee. This is pretty well known at this point. She doesn’t denounce Putin’s war crimes, uses Trumps lawyers….

            And now, a long-time Trump supporter is backing her, and you’re suggesting that it’s for the strategic purpose of hurting Jill’s chances? She never had a chance to begin with! She only exists to take votes like yours away from the only person capable of beating Trump.

            The Olympic contending mental gymnast required to avoid the obvious here are impressive!

            • Saleh@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              So you claim Steins goal is to siphon votes away from Harris in order to help Trump.

              So the target audience of Stein under that premise are center/progressive voters. The target audience clearly is not Trump voters.

              So even if Steins goal is solely to siphon votes from the Dems, any vote that goes to her is a “win” for her. And the opposite, any voter deciding to go back to Harris is a “loss” for her.

              Him endorsing Stein is clearly aimed at achieving the latter. You said it yourself,

              Stein’s campaign exists solely to harm the democratic nominee

              So her target audience are solely potential dem voters. And these are alienated by that endorsement, as is also very clear in this thread.

              So there is two options:

              A - the guy is a total moron
              B - he is achieving exactly what he wants

              A seems unlikely to me, as nazi leaders are despicable and evil, but smart and scheming.

              • Wren@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                So you claim Steins goal is to siphon votes away from Harris in order to help Trump.

                Yes.

                • Saleh@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  So you agree that the nazi guy is helping Harris by him alienating progressive voters from Stein.

                  Then you have to conclude that he is just very very dumb, or you have to agree with my statement, that he wants to harm Stein and help Harris. Which brings the important question, what does the nazi guy gain from helping Harris?

                  As the guy was leading a large organization, him being dumb is unlikely. Him being good at scheming and manipulating on the other hand is very much on brand.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Harris has her own share of problematic endorsements (Cheney, Gonzalez,…). Sure, they’re not explicitly racist, ‘just’ war criminals, but she accepted them and is actually bragging about getting them.

          • Wren@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Right. Because Harris needs the support to keep a criminally charged rapist from being a dictator for a day and calling the military against his own people. Having the support of a Republican in this environment is a pretty big deal. That is reaching FAR across the aisle in an almost unheard of show of support- and it sends a message of solidarity against a fascist.

            Having a dirt bag irrelevant racist support a sketchy spoiler candidate?

            Well, that’s just damn easy to “deny,” isn’t it? I mean… there’s no downside. And it sure looks good to the press to turn him down, doesn’t it? But then again, it doesn’t look good to have him up her ass to begin with…

            • jonne@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Why can’t she reach far to the left to get their support instead? If potential Jill Stein voters can lose her the election, she could see what those people care about and reach out to them?

              They would’ve probably been fine with a stop on sending offensive weapons while keeping iron dome stocked or something like that.

              Instead they’re trying to find the mythical voter that gives a shit about what Dick Cheney thinks.

              • Wren@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Because sadly, FAR more people give a shit about what Cheney says than there are those that give a shit about what Stein says. And not only that, but I’d wager that no matter what she does- a large percentage of the far left and socialists aren’t going to vote for Harris anyway. Even if Stein endorsed her. (Remember a guy named Bernie back in 2016? Yeah. A lot of the “Bros” voted for Trump to spite the DNC)

                Their minds are made up and are a locked in every bit as tight as their folded arms are.

                And I’d wager that she is ACUTELY aware of this. Between her, and all of her advisers- do you think there is no one that understands what she must do to get the votes she needs? Do you seriously think she hasn’t thought of courting the far left vote? She’s not an idiot.

                She knows you exist.

                And she knows you have a track record of not showing up regardless. Over 100,000,000 people didn’t vote in 2016. And we got trump- with warning signs of what he would do.

                We don’t have warning signs now. We know EXACTLY what he will do, and you are all holding your vote hostage over shit you didn’t even care about a year ago.

                So I’m sorry, but your demands are going to fall on willfully deaf ears. The far left vote is not something they are going to risk losing an election over. And historically, candidates that lean too far left…

                Lose.

                And now, at this point, I’m going to say that we’re far too late in the game for me to care about how you feel about this. This is what it is. This is where we are. You can help us keep America breathing by voting for the one person that has a chance to win, or you can pull the plug because of a single-issue that most of you don’t even really understand.

                Either way. Someone is getting elected. Whether you like it or not- with or without your help.

  • capital@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Duke, a proudly antisemitic white supremacist, endorsed Trump in 2016 and 2020, but on his radio show yesterday, he slammed Trump’s “subservience to Israel and to the Jewish lobby” and said only Stein would stand up to Israel and its “genocide” against Palestinians.

    Weird… sounds like a lot of “leftists” on lemmy…

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Democrats: Jill Stein is draining voters off of Harris and could cost us the election!

    Jill Stein voters: See article title.

  • Jackary@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Of course Lemmy (which is leftist when it comes to politics because “left is the good guys!!1!1”) cares so much about something so stupid.

    Hey yall, David Duke endorses people but that doesnt mean theyre in cahoots lol. Sheesh this is pathetic.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            It does kind of depend on how you classify various police departments and whether they’re considered independent groups or cells under a single umbrella organization. But then again, in its heyday, the Venn diagram of the police and the KKK had quite a lot of overlap.

  • Artyom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The funniest part about this is I had no idea David Duke was alive. He was the main villain of BlackKKlansman. Imagine living to see yourself get written as the villain of a hit movie.

    Also, mandatory fuck David Duke and Jill Stein.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Harris is openly embracing Dick Cheney endorsements, lol. It is nothing for Jill to reject it. This is also the same crowd that “Biden has changed for his segregationist” lmao.

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think you’re misunderstanding the Cheney’s support.

      Dick and Liz (and Bush and others) aren’t supporting Harris because she aligns with them or they like her. They’re doing it because trump is so heinous, literally anything is better than a second trump term.

      They don’t want Harris; they’ve just reached the conclusion trump will destroy the GOP. And they’re right.

      As Lindsay Graham said in 2016:

      If we nominate Trump, we will get destroyed…and we will deserve it.

      This is self-preservation.

      • RunningInRVA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t think Bush weighed in this election season, did he? I was pretty sure he sat this one out so far as endorsements and public statements of support go.

      • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        That explains why they support her, it doesn’t explain why Harris is bragging about that endorsement and campaigning with him. Especially when her main message is saving democracy and he’s the guy that actually stole an election.

        • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Especially when her main message is saving democracy

          This is exactly the reason. Because saving democracy right now means getting every possible vote, and the Cheneys can sway some old, Reagan/Bush republicans who reflexively vote R without really paying attention. If even the Cheneys support Harris, they might take notice. It’s an enemy-of-my-enemy situation.

          • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            It’s an enemy-of-my-enemy situation

            Thats the same situation that stein is in, and the wider pro-palestinian movement are in with white supremacists like David Duke. Yes they support your movement but have completely different worldview and in most cases opposing values and motives. The right thing to do in that case is what stein, and most of the pro-palestinian movement have done and call these people out for the trash they ,denounce them, and remove them from the gathering spaces. Granted Cheney is a different case then David Duke and it’s up to each group to decide where to draw the line. I personally would draw it away from a plutocratic war criminal like Cheney.

            If not for moral principle then for strategic reasons, having those people around discredits you. Yeah the pro-palestinian group could gain a couple white supremacists but they lose far more support among the great majority of people who despise white supremacists. Yeah the dems could gain some of those Romney Republicans , but they’re also alienating the people who hate Cheney and everything he represents. That ratio is obviously less one sided then the Nazi, anti-Nazi ratio, hopefully, but it’s still a chance your taking on Cheney. I wouldn’t take that since Cheneys popularity and legacy have tanked in value in the last decade.

      • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t give af what their reasons are Dick Cheney is one of the worst people on the planet. It is easy not to stand by him. But I’m fine with voting third party this point. I don’t want to be allies with liberals who will throw anyone under the bus to retain comfort.

          • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Harris literally continuing some of his policies, you folks don’t hate Trump as much as you put on. Dems gave up in my state so he is going to win it either way next.

            • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              And you hate him so much you’re voting to help him win. I’m doing more than you are.

              Dems gave up in my state so he is going to win it either way next.

              That’s a cop out and you know it.

              • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                You know damn well there are some states that he is going to win for free. I’m in one of them. Yes Dems have given up on some states as well due to seeing it as a waste of resources. Plus she is openly courting Republicans and I don’t support right-wingers. Maybe you do.

        • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Nobody is ‘standing by him’. Hitler liked dogs. Am I supposed to hate dogs because Hitler ‘stood by’ them?

          I couldn’t give less of a fuck who the Cheneys support. Their opinions don’t factor into my choices at all.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            This whole topic is the same people who make excuses for why the Cheney endorsements are good (or at a minimum irrelevant) saying how David Duke’s endorsement should make people supporting Jill Stein think twice.

            Jill Stein is a grifter and a spoiler working to advance conservative causes, but the hypocrisy here is breathtaking.

            • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              There’s a very clear difference: Stein is a well-documented, intentional spoiler who’s funding comes primarily from Republican mega-donors and Russian interests, and who recently said out loud her purpose isn’t to advance her party but exclusively to block Harris.

              Her track record makes that endorsement poignant.

              If she was sincere and didn’t already align with fascist interests, we wouldn’t care what Nazis say about her.

              • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                LOL, no there isn’t.

                Horrible person endorses candidate I like: “you can help who endorses you, it doesn’t mean anything about their values”. Horrible person endorses candidate I don’t like: “see, if you support them you’re in bed with [the KKK/war criminals]”.

                If she was sincere and didn’t already align with fascist interests, we wouldn’t care what Nazis say about her.

                If Harris was a progressive peacenik who didn’t seem open to aligning with neocon foreign policy, no one would think anything of welcoming Cheney into her campaign.

                It’s the same exact reasoning, just reformulated for whether you like the candidate in question.

                • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Harris has not “aligned with” any Cheney or other neocon. Stop pretending that you don’t understand how electoral politics works.

                • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  This isn’t about like or dislike. Again, it’s about her track record. If Duke had come out to support Cornel West, we’d have collectively shrugged. I’d still strongly recommend nobody vote for him because he’s a spoiler, too, and I don’t like him as a candidate, but a Nazi endorsement for him would not make any difference.

                  The entire reason Duke supporting Stein matters is because of her history supporting fascists. How is this difficult to grasp?

            • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Yep! Insane hypocrisy around these parts.

              And anyone who doesn’t agree with the echo chamber, is a “Trumper” or works “for the Russians” or my personal fav, “posting/commenting in bad faith.” lol

              • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                Funny words from someone with a proven history of trolling, lack of civility, and spamming according to the modlog. But please, enlighten us all about how you engage in good faith posting and commenting.

          • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yeah having his daughter who defended all of his bad actions on your events isn’t standing by him and he going on about how honored she is. Liberals will literally work with fascists. Malcolm X was correct long ago. Vote for who you want best of luck.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Jesus can you people just stop pretending that you don’t understand basic electoral politics… For fuck sake it’s so tired.

              • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                Ahh yes the average electoral politics post insurrection and still barely outperforming in polls. These aren’t normal times goofball.

            • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              No, this is a situation where the dems need to get as many votes as possible, and you’re underestimating the voting power of old people.

              The dems are accepting the Cheney’s support specifically to wake up some moderate, old conservatives who would otherwise vote reflexively for trump simply because of the R after his name.

              This isn’t an ideological move, but a purely political one. Politics is not always tasteful. Ideological purity is useless against actual, real-life fascism, and it’s a strategic move. Reality isn’t always rainbows and unicorns.

              • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                It isn’t ideological purity. The only people who give up ground is Dems that is why the GOP can dog walk them while going on about space lazers and weather control. There should be some limits when it comes to people like Dick Cheney getting a pass. I’ve done the whole vote for the lesser evil. I’m good. I’ll do what I can locally and vote down ballot for in local elections.

                When Trump can come out call Harris for adopting his policies and she has nothing to say back. I’m good. I don’t support right-wingers even with (D) next to their name.

                • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  This is not giving up ground. The only people looking at this and thinking it means Harris somehow supports the Cheneys rather than the other way round are ideological purists. Nobody sane is giving the Cheneys a pass. They’re slime and we all know it. The only thing this tells us is that he’s* so unabashedly heinous that even old school Republicans can’t stomach him. It’s not a difficult concept.

                  e: *

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          “I don’t like that one of the worst people in the world is advocating for a candidate, and I’m not going tk vote for that candidate because of this- even though *the other candidates is objectively far worse than the guy I hate”

          Is how I interpret that.

          Throw your vote away if you want. Just don’t whine here when trump wins because of you.

                • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  This election hinges on a hair. Everyone who’s not got a bridge to sell you is saying that, and you think you can predict the outcome?

                  I’m not buying any bridges. I don’t know who’s going to win, and neither do you or anyone else.

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              You literally just posted a topic about Trump beating Harris in a battleground state poll. And another about good news for Trump. Along with a stream of other posts that seems curated to talk about bad signs for Harris.

                • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  You don’t just post random political news from across a range of topics, you post stuff that talks about Harris being weak.

                  If you were confident Harris would win, why would it be interesting that a poll showed her down in a crucial state? Why would it be interesting that fewer Democrats are registered to vote? She’s supposedly got it in the bag, so none of these things would matter.

                  I think Trump winning is a very real possibility. It looks a lot more likely than 2020 and that was a razor thin victory.

          • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Trump’s rise is literally because of Dems lack of action results for poor and working class people. Harris is closer to him on Policy than anyone else. Even Trump said so at the debate, and she is still building the wall. You guys don’t have Trump as much as you claim.