Having rejected centralised restrictions on technology then, the alternative we are left with is decentralised restriction. This could include boycotts, agreements, social stigma, parallel economies, civil disobedience and more, with the goal of limiting the development, distribution or adoption of anti-human technologies.
So you require that people just boycott countries like China, stop buying their trinkets and they’ll stop creating doomsday weapons?
Whats the alternative, let China and Russia build up the technology and we stay in the past?
The US has the largest military because its the reserve currency, they print money and export their inflation and they spend that money on military expenditures, which prevents people from moving off USD.
This then lets them sanction other countries and control the worlds shipping lanes, so asking them to stop developing their military is asking for the existing global order to cease to exist, and then you’re at the whims of whatever power fills that void.
Bios are becoming more and more locked down, that’ll be the next thing, at the tech lobbyists behest.
I got banned from here as well for saying verified facts with evidence. Its all the admins discretion in the end, and they’re political.