He’s right. When the bulk of tariffs’ impact hits, it’s going to be much, much worse than it is now.

0.1s is way too long, you need to optimize your startup time. /s

SCP-155

Unpopular opinion but I don’t see what is wrong with this? With the current policy, if your account is public people who you block will still be able to see your tweets by simply logout (e.g. by opening twitter in a private window, using a different browser where they are not logged in, etc. doesn’t take any effort).

I think this is setting the wrong expectations.

Yeah… Why are articles like this being upvoted… I expected better from lemmy

Yubikey supports pin protection, the newest one even have a fingerprint scanner.

I see, thanks for explaining. So IIUC, rook is intended for headless systems?

But keepassxc already provides a secret service ootb?

Well it says ついに発売

Put it together it more or less means “(Windows 7) has finally been released/started sale”

Errr I use mdns all the time…

Why are you running echo with sudo? Makes no sense.

How does this work? Do they ask other people to remember their passwords?

Time to add a cron job to auto reboot it once a day

I use syncthing so there’s a copy of my password database on each of my devices.

Sounds like not using Google search would be a way more effective way of reducing CO2

“If something is silenced, then that must mean it is right” is a pretty bad argument. There are genuinely good reasons to ban something. Being unnecessarily aggressive can be one.

There is a line somewhere I think. Like people weren’t 100% sure the atomic bomb won’t ignite the atmosphere (it’s only very unlikely), but they still tested it. Similarly the probability of creating micro blackholes at LHC is not zero either, yet they still ran it.

If we have to make sure everything is 100% safe before we can do anything, we will be stuck with the status quo.

If it gets “stolen” by a for-profit corporation it only makes it better, because now my software has reached more people, thus (theoretically) improving their lives.

well that’s a very idealistic, and capitalistic way of looking at this (i.e. for-profit corporation is making a profit only because it’s making people’s lives better). which just isn’t the case in real life.

realistically, when you release something in a permissive license, you are more likely to improve someone’s bottom line, than to improve people’s lives in general.

IIRC these are words from the man himself. In a documentary about him, he said he was not a hero, just an ordinary guy, and you should not need to be a hero to stand up and do the right thing.

Out of curiosity, what GPU do you have?