At least Israel is safe, god forbid the Dems were to actually act on principles for once

Never should have gotten an exclusion in the first place. It’s a shitty rule but he shouldn’t have gotten special treatment

So the government is collecting 500 billion less this year. They didn’t lose anything because they never had it in the first place

Given their AI ambitions, a solution could be building data centers in multiple locations to avoid overloading any one region’s power grid. It would be technically challenging, but it may be necessary, Russinovich told Semafor.

“I think it’s inevitable, especially when you get to the kind of scale that these things are getting to,” he said. “In some cases, that might be the only feasible way to train them is to go across data centers, or even across regions,” he said.

Pretty interesting!

Some KTMs have settings that can be adjusted via the screen like ABS (turned off for offroading) power settings etc…

So if you have a screen might as well add navigation to it

Clever, here’s what you sound like

Well, ackshually *shidding noises*

Reply once more for more thought provoking debate

Agreed, especially because lobbyists will get shit that otherwise wouldn’t pass to be bundled in the bill. One example is the infrastructure bill and all the non-infrastructure related stuff they put in there

The reason they voted against it is because alot of other things where bundled in the bill. Congress should put forth a bill for FEMA funding only so that they could help people

Yeah your right, my only concern is them having a captive market which would allow them to jack up prices but right now there are lots of competing companies so it shouldn’t happen withing the next decade

Houses are expensive enough, no need to make it worse

Allows me to anonymously buy and sell

It depends on how that country is formed, and what happens to Jerusalem.

If Israel withdraws from west bank and Gaza, and truly allows them to be a sovereign state(s), with their own navy, air force, ground force, then the US would step in via the UAE. I would also guess that they will get lots of money coming in from other Arab governments because they all want influence in Palestine, in addition to money from Arabs as people.

In terms of government, if elections are held I assume Hamas would win (in Gaza and wb). In which case countries like Egypt will start being less friendly towards Hamas than they are right now, because they can be seen as a viable government. The reason Egyptian government would dislike Hamas is because they are a spin-off of the brotherhood, which the sisi couped in order to gain power. Generally, Egyptian government is very afraid of the brotherhood and will root them out wherever possible because they are often the only party (other than police and military) that may be in a position to rule the country.

In terms of long term economy and how the government would function I have no idea. Hamas controls an area the size of a small town, and the Palestinian authority has no real autonomy, its not even allowed to collect taxes. My guess tho is that it will resemble south Africa in terms of infrastructure (garbage).

I don’t think it will collapse like Libya and be run by criminals, but it won’t be as prosperous and safe as many of the Gulf countries.

Basically I’m talking out of my ass, there’s really no way to know

Being the first to do x, first man on the moon for example. Or be the 28th president

Wdym?

Yes but I’m not going to buy a house for 6 months just to sell it, it’s not very feasible.

I’m staying in a city temporarily for about 6 months, whers would I live if I couldn’t rent?

Not sure if it counts but the devonian extinction is probably my favorite. Wiped out a bunch of marine vertebrates (I hate fish, they had it coming)

The theories behind why it happened changed, and it’s technically two small extinction events. Although it is pretty big iirc >95% of the worlds vertebrates died off and did not come back

Simpler to say is

Raqam ghalat

That’s what I say, you could throw in a sorry at the end

Trump started off coherent, but ~30% in he went of the rails.

Kamala on the other hand looks like she has no strong values, she doesn’t seem like a Dem candidate. What kind of Dem candidate is pro fracking? Kamala honestly seems disingenuous.

Trump on the other hand didn’t form more than 20 complete sentences, so I can’t really call him disingenuous because he doesn’t seem to stand for anything

Not sure how it originated, but trump at the debate said that migrants are eating the pets of Springfield residents.

“In Springfield, they’re eating the dogs, the people that came in. They’re eating the cats. They’re eating — they’re eating the pets of the people that live there.”

https://piped.video/watch?v=-y91NDLuxyE