

As soon as someone who’s not a member of Epstein & Associates is in charge of the various departments and branches of the government, then maybe someone can do something about it.
For now they’re limited in what they can do, but creating a report and making it public is one thing that is within their power. Faulting them for doing that is kinda strange.


Yes, we know, the system is flawed. If “transparency” is as worthless as you claim, then so is “faulting the entire system,” which is what you say you’re doing. Not sure how you can apply your logic consistently and come to different conclusions for those two things.
Transparency alone doesn’t fix the issue, no. And no one is claiming it does. But the issue will be much harder to fix without transparency. No transparency makes accountability nearly impossible. And right now, while anyone with an interest in fixing the issue is powerless to do so, transparency is a bare minimum that they can at least try to meet. And that’s what they’re doing.
So no, I don’t think transparency is worthless. It’s necessary. Not sufficient, but necessary no less.
If Ted Bundy controlled all the police in the nation either directly or through influence and loyalty, then congress tracking his crimes and making the reports available to the public would be better than doing nothing about it.