The president used the term to describe Jose Antonio Ibarra, a Venezuelan who crossed the border into the U.S. and has been charged with the murder of Laken Riley.
I’m gonna make a politics sub and have an AI moderator that rates your comments on a little ratings system:
Personal insults, racism, pure hostility that is clearly over the line
Just asserting firmly how you think it is without any real backing, being combative, refusing to answer questions or engage with the other person’s content, inviting or continuing long pointless back-and-forths, constantly changing the subject
Saying what you think and why, at least
Answering questions, engaging, giving sources, responding to what the other person is saying
Factual honesty combined with good insight, conciseness, admitting weaknesses in your own position or being actively inviting to hearing the other side in detail, or visibly changing your mind on something
If you make a post, it stalks a bunch of your recent postings and computes your average, and in order to comment, it has to be at least 3. Just 3. 3’s honestly not that high a bar. It’ll send you a detailed breakdown of what messages it picked and how it rated them, so it’s transparent, and it refreshes like once a week or something and obviously if your average drops once you’re in there then you’re banned for a short time.
But if you post any significant amount of 2, then probably fuck you you can’t post. Yes I know you’re upset, yes I know, I’m a Nazi who wants to play God with who can post in my little playground. I don’t care. You’re a 2.4, get out, I wanna talk politics and learn things without having the same pointless back-and-forths over and over. This system of “everyone can come in by default no matter how much of a jackass they are and we try to cope with the extreme bad faith people after the fact” clearly doesn’t work real real well.
I think it might honestly be a great system, better than having rules based on just the extreme cases, or then trying to figure out explicitly who are state-sponsored shills like the big paid social media sites do. This is my mission now.
I’m gonna make a politics sub and have an AI moderator that rates your comments on a little ratings system:
If you make a post, it stalks a bunch of your recent postings and computes your average, and in order to comment, it has to be at least 3. Just 3. 3’s honestly not that high a bar. It’ll send you a detailed breakdown of what messages it picked and how it rated them, so it’s transparent, and it refreshes like once a week or something and obviously if your average drops once you’re in there then you’re banned for a short time.
But if you post any significant amount of 2, then probably fuck you you can’t post. Yes I know you’re upset, yes I know, I’m a Nazi who wants to play God with who can post in my little playground. I don’t care. You’re a 2.4, get out, I wanna talk politics and learn things without having the same pointless back-and-forths over and over. This system of “everyone can come in by default no matter how much of a jackass they are and we try to cope with the extreme bad faith people after the fact” clearly doesn’t work real real well.
I think it might honestly be a great system, better than having rules based on just the extreme cases, or then trying to figure out explicitly who are state-sponsored shills like the big paid social media sites do. This is my mission now.
If it means all the negative karma propagandists can’t post there, I’d be totally down for it. Hit me up when you get it running.
Good luck with that. One dedicated asshole is going to destroy either your hardware, or your wallet, in under a week.