• Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Won’t you please stop and think of the billionaires?”

    “For just $5,479,452.05 a day, you can support a multibillionaire who needs you TODAY.”

    🎶🎶 “We are the world… we are old white men… We are the ones that have yachts that need second yachts to land helicopters on… so you start giving us your change… If you don’t, we’ll fucking find a way to kill you.” 🎶🎶

    • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t get the desire to violently dispose of billionaires; it’s a status defined by wealth, we just gotta take their money and they stop being billionaires. Problem solved, right?

      • cheesepotatoes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well there is the issue that to become a billionaire one must exploit and abuse tens, hundreds, thousands of people? Not to mention second order effects from their actions like bankrolling politicians that strip workers rights or safety standards for example, which impacts millions of people. Some people want to see some justice I suppose.

  • spider@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “You’re trying to take away the incentives for people to work hard,” [Catsimatidis] said.

    The working class is referred to as such for a reason.

    He should stop pretending to be one of them.

    • eskimofry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, said billionaire should stop gaslighting everyone. Most people I know will try to find better work if their basic needs are fulfilled. Nobody except a billionaire wants hand outs.

      • spider@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nobody except a billionaire wants hand outs.

        …and gets them, usually on demand.

    • matlag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Let’s be real: who would work hard to make ONLY millions instead of billions? Most people would obviously rather stay poor.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. Most policies are in billionaire’s favors, since they fund lobbying groups and super pacs. They mostly stay quiet about everything because they’re getting their way behind the scenes. If they’re complaining outright, it’s an absolute win for everyone else

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or, as is often the case with Biden, promising to do something right with the odds of actually going through with it being slim 🤷

      • Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah feels like every weekend he has promised to make Israel cease-fire by Monday since “Genociding with Biden” became a meme and somehow hes never been called out on that huge glaring lie, in fact I am often told to quiet if I bring it up.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Would it be illegal to start a like Jury Nullification Ad Campaign for murdering billionaires? Just like, if you’re on trial for running over a billionaire, we pledge to find you not guilty.

  • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t really understand why they’re upset, or how it will raise that much revenue. As the article points out, most billionaires don’t get their billions from income, they get it from investments. For instance, Jeff Bezos’ salary is like $80k, and then he gets other compensation that puts him at like $1.7M. if you put him in a much higher tax bracket, he shouldn’t even care - would hardly notice - because he’s worth $194B. To put that in perspective, if he earns just 5% a year in growth on that, it’s almost $10B. His compensation is like 0.02% of what he’s likely to make on investments, if that.

    It’s also worth mentioning that most billionaires can’t really spend much of the billions. If Bezos tried to cash out much of his Amazon stock, the price would plummet and he’d be worth a lot less. What those guys do is take out loans with the stock as collateral and live off of that. Of course, Bezos himself is at a level of wealth where he can cash out a small percentage and it’s still enormous. I think last year he cashed out like $2B worth, which is a giant amount of money, but only 1% of his net worth.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Biden went over this. A 25% AMT, which doesn’t care what your type of revenue is, you’re paying at least 25%.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe so, but Biden was just talking about the income tax rate.

        The problem with a wealth tax is that it seems like it would be hard to do. If I buy a painting for $1M, do I get taxed on that amount regardless of its value even if it’s worth ten times that? Do I have to get it appraised? If so, just once or every year because the value can fluctuate? If I buy a rare classic car that’s rusted out, and I restore it, how is the value calculated? Now imagine I have a giant art collection and a giant car collection. It just doesn’t seem workable.

        • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m sure all that stuff is insured. Not difficult to assess wealth. Don’t have a wealth tax kick in until over $30 million (whatever number). Seems imminently workable to me.

  • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Billionaires can suck my dick and fuck right off into the sun. This shit has GOT to fucking stop! 100% tax on anything over $200M, and I am being real generous with that.

  • abbadon420@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Did you expect an addict to thank you when you take away their drug cold turkey? Billionairism is a mental disorder, like addiction, and it should be handled with the same care. The kind of care that only billionairs can afford in the US, I must add.

  • pastabatman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Biden claimed in his State of the Union address that the 25 percent minimum tax on the ultra-rich will raise $500 billion over 10 years. “Imagine what that could do for America,” he said.

    I may be totally out of touch but does that seem kind of low to anyone else? I mean, that’s a lot of money in absolute terms but the government spent $6.3 trillion in FY 2023 alone. We should still do it obviously, but hopefully that number goes up a little.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m surprised it’s that high. The reason their effective rate goes down, is getting money by ways that are either special cases in the tax code or aren’t “income”. Until you fix those, wealthy people will still have the lowest tax rate.

      …although apparently the tax rate for long term capital gains is already 20% for the wealthy. I didn’t know that

    • Hapankaali@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      $500 billion is a sizable chunk of that $6.3 trillion, and it’s still only a 25% tax rate, and then only the “ultra-rich.”

      If one considers something more reasonable, like a 70% tax of income over $100,000, then you’re talking about more substantial amounts to really start catching up to top economies.

      • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        500 billion over 10 years is not a sizeable chunk of a single year total.

        They spend more than that a year on “defense”.

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, it sounds correct. Taxing billionaires’ income is fine, but the real money would come from actually taxing corporations more.

      See, they only have income in certain circumstances, so the amount raised from an income tax would not be very high. You can raise corporate taxes by a little bit and get much more.

      That way the income is taxed before it gets to anyone. It doesn’t matter if they have a billion dollars. Plus it encourages investment in the company (wages, new products, better quality, etc.) because business costs are tax write-offs.

  • vin@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is ragebait content from democrats. 25 percent minimum income tax on anyone worth at least $100 million is still grossly unfair. 50 billion in a year is a pittance for the owning class. Removing loopholes and including expenditure as a factor is needed to fix income tax.