• Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Any conservative board or sub, will immediately be overtaken by fascist snowflakes. I mean who the hell would want to freely mod a conservative sub in their free time? The job description alone requires someone deeply disturbed

        • liv@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have to disagree! I freely mod a conservative sub in my spare time.

          It has definitely not been taken over by fascist snowflakes.

          As proof, you are welcome to come and see for yourself: ☆ kbin conservative community

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was just thinking it would be fun to mod a conservative sub but take a conservative instead of a regressive viewpoint. Like: “people who do crimes should be held accountable regardless of their cult size,” “investing in infrastructure or climate mitigation is huge ROI so we should do a lot of both,” “we need regulations to manifest the invisible hand so the market can price things efficiently.”

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Any investment by the government in a private company should be done through the purchase of newly issued shares so that the government has voting rights and can push them to take decisions in favour of the long term interests of the country first and foremost.”

            • barsquid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Right? It’s fun as hell. And if they’re insolvent that’s just a fire sale on the stock. Why are we harming the free market’s ability to price things by handing out money?

        • fartington@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean who the hell would want to freely mod a conservative sub in their free time?

          George Santos

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    child rape party. party of people who want to rape children, want to ensure that child rapists do not face consequences, and want to ensure that raped children cannot escape the consequences of being raped.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m voting as hard as I can, but they’re making it as difficult as possible and even some of our leaders advocate for ignoring the votes.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re voting, you’re not the problem. We’re failing at the polls and then complaining of the repercussions for their entire term.

      • Deadrek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        As problematic as it would be… You know most of them would abso-fucking-lutely hate it.

        Which highlights the, almost assured, possibility that they would hate being called arab more than bastards.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let’s set aside morality, because that’s also wrong. It’s factually incorrect. You want someone to die in childbirth? Knock them up at 16. Early 20s are the actual reproductive prime.

    • darctiger88@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup. Whenever someone tries to justify underage marriage with “most fertile period” or “it’s always been the norm”, you know they’re a pedo. Teenage pregnancies are risky because the pelvis hasn’t fully developed, and the girl is more likely to suffer severe depression as well. Most fertile age is more like 19-32 not 12-18. Also, I live in the UK and marriage records kept by the church from the 1400s show the vast majority of girls married for the first time in their early twenties, not teen years :)

      • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Truth. Marriages at a super young age were not normal outside of nobility doing it for political alliance reasons and even then the general advice were not to try for a pregnancy because your risks of killing a young spouse were astronomically high. However the concept was popularized by fiction that basically wanted to trade on the idea of a gritty nasty medieval age where the darkness of the human soul cam be laid bare and how mankind has evolved into a kinder more civilized place… basically the same thematic itch as Warhammer grimdark logic.

        In regards to the whole “darkness of the human soul” thing it really doesn’t stack. People just want to believe their personal id (as in the Freudian concept, not “identity” ) is more universal than it is.

      • RBWells@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I looked up my family on the Mormon genealogy site and was surprised how many of the women married around 28-30 years old. Certainly not as teens and I really was surprised. Like, I as a modern woman had kids younger than a good chunk of my ancestresses.