• uebquauntbez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Didn’t french minister Robbespierre say and act same in french revolution aera? Before he was executed by his own people.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Who was with his terrorist father in Yemen at the time. This isn’t exactly murder most foul.

      • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because his dad was part of al qaeda the kid deserved to die? That’s totally not fucked up at all

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not about deserving it. His dad took him to a war zone while he was working for a non state military. Not everything is personal or even about the person who gets killed in a warzone. Soldiers call it rolling the dice for a reason. The bomb on the roadside goes off. Does it hit the humvee with the gun crew, or the cargo truck carrying refugees? Nobody knows until it happens. One is seen as a normal part of war and the other as something despicable. But the difference is less than a second. Nobody woke up that day and said, “today we’re going to kill that kid”.

          • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            You don’t think the US military has the capabilities to know exactly who and what they’re striking?

      • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Who was with his terrorist father in Yemen at the time

        According to the United States government, Abdulrahman al-Awlaki’s father, Anwar al-Awlaki, was a leader of al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.[2] Anwar al-Awlaki was killed by a CIA drone strike several days before his son’s death.[3]

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You could try not being disingenuous and read a couple more sentences.

          the target of the October 14, 2011, airstrike was Ibrahim al-Banna, an Egyptian believed to be a senior operative in al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.[7] Another U.S. administration official speaking on condition of anonymity described Abdulrahman al-Awlaki as a bystander who was “in the wrong place at the wrong time”, stating that “the U.S. government did not know that Mr. Awlaki’s son was there” before the airstrike was ordered.[

          He was there because his father brought him there. Nobody was aiming for him.

          • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            You could try not being disingenuous

            Right back atcha.

            What you said:

            Who was with his terrorist father in Yemen at the time

            Which is blatantly untrue

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh for shit’s sake taking refuge in semantics when you know damn well the word could mean either thing is ridiculous. I’m not going to waste ten comments explaining the exact meaning of the word “time” in this specific case while you just keep throwing No True Scotsman at it.

              • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                the word could mean either thing

                it can literally only mean the one thing. His father had been dead for days, you claimed otherwise as thought it justified what happened.

                No True Scotsman at it.

                Showing how intelligent you are with random fallacy name dropping.

      • Zron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        He was a US citizen.

        The military should not be drone striking its own citizens, no matter what they’re suspected of. He had the right to a trial.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Actually, joining an enemy military strips you of your citizenship. But even then, it’s not a stable area. You can’t just ring up the Yemeni police to go arrest them and the NYPD is going to laugh at you. So you call on the guys who can reach the area. Problem, they’re the military and this is a war. So even without the first sentence we’re back to using a missile instead of the police because nobody is going to commit suicide for this and we’re not going to let them operate freely on the notion that we’re not allowed to fight that particular enemy.

          Which is why joining an enemy military is an automatic loss of citizenship.

          • Zron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            When did Al-Qaeda become a military? It’s a terrorist organization.

            And when did it become a war. Congress hasn’t declared a war since World War 2. Legally, all of killing in the Middle East has been done under the guise of military policing actions.

            Are we going to drone strike proud boy leaders now? They did try to overthrow the US government a few years ago. Oh wait, they just got slaps on the wrist.

            So do we only blow up US citizens and deny them their rights when it would be difficult to get them? I guess the FBI can stop spending so much money on training agents to apprehend suspects, if they’re running or have already fled the country, we’ll just assassinate them because that’s way easier and safer.

            The fact that this guy, regardless of what he did, was assassinated on the orders of a US president, and nothing happened, should be deeply disturbing. You don’t have rights if someone can just blow you up from out of nowhere for any reason. You just have privileges that can be revoked at any time.

            He had the right to a trial. Not a privilege to have one, a right. An attempt to apprehend him should have at least been made.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Nobody said you had to be connected to a geographic state to be a military.

              An AUMF is a declaration of war. Read the War Powers Act. The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war. It does not require Congress to use a set of magic words.

              The proud boys are fucking infants in comparison to Al Qaeda, they’re also well within reach of law enforcement agents. But if you want to know for real, check out the times governors have deployed the National Guard for an armed stand off. There is absolutely a military remedy to a domestic insurrection in US law. We do try to avoid that but if someone really pushed it they would take the leash off the military.

              This is also a far cry from FBI agents working with police in developing countries. This isn’t trying to figure out which Argentinian cop would tip off the arrest target. This is the Yemeni militia laughing at the FBI agents while letting AQ know there are Americans around to be captured.

              Again. Nobody is going to commit suicide to provide you with a trial if you are actively making war against the US. Nor have they ever been required to because that is an insane imposition to the defense of the country. Reducing this to a manhunt ended for the sake of convenience is a straw man. You’d have a point if this happened somewhere like India. But it didn’t. And we’re under no obligation to let the enemy keep operating on the hope they travel to the wrong country.

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kaitlan Collins, to her credit, interviewed Bill Barr and asked about an anecdote that I had shared about a meeting he and I were both in the Oval Office, where Trump straight up said a staffer who leaked a story should be executed. And Bill Barr kind of danced it and said I don’t recall that specific instance, but there were others where we talked about executing people. How do you rationalize that is a person fit in sound judgment to be president of the United States?

  • Eldritch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not stunning to anyone who’s paid attention. So I bet there’s lots of people who are deeply shocked by this.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Morose humor is simply a way to deal with tragedy and sadness. It’s often the most we can do for ourselves or anyone else in such situations. Seeing as in this situation especially it would require to impress upon people the importance of Being educated in general and about specific things that they have no interest in. Both of which are generally out of our control. So we all just default to recognizing the absurdity.

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Don’t get me wrong, I’m not faulting you or anything… it’s both absurd and sad that major alarm bells have been going off about Trump for a very long time and a lot of people don’t notice or look the other way.

              Better to laugh than cry I guess.

              • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                I didn’t think you were :-) and unfortunately Trump is just the most recent symptom. It’s been going on for longer than even my parents have been alive. And they were born in the late 40s and early 50s. At least here in the US.

                Grandpappy Bush was tied to a coup in the 30s

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or the ones who say they can’t vote for Biden because he’s not doing the things he’s not got the power to do. All in pursuit of some ephemeral moral High Ground. Which they think exonerates them of all the genocide and killing that will still happen. Possibly even increase if such actions were to be taken.

      They all think they’ve got a simple easily implementable answer to all the problems. Despite the best minds of generations of people having been unable to actually solve it. The ignorance and hubris is palpable.

      I think the easiest and most simple to implement solution to all this. Would be to time travel back to the selection of places for Israel to be carved out of. And hard veto Palestine somehow.

        • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What you don’t understand, is that they’ll still get delivered. Wait…. I’m pretty sure you DO understand this. But it really messes up your propaganda if you were to admit it.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            No they won’t. Wait, I’m sorry, let’s hear it. How do you think the weapons are going to be delivered if Israel is declared completely ineligible under the Leahy Law and FSA?

            • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              ROFL… show how you don’t know how congress works without saying you don’t know how congress works.

              Even if Biden is able to halt it- which he isn’t…. When you succeed in getting Trump elected, he’s going to go HAM on Palestine. So tell us again how much you care to stop it again?

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m sorry, but by what method exactly will Congress bypass the Leahy Law and FSA?

                None of this schoolyard innuendo. Prove your knowledge.

                • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You mean like when I asked you to provide a name of someone running that could win against Trump in November?

                  You forgot didn’t you?

                  You had no answer. I asked you several times. You refused to answer. Proving that no only do you not have anything better to say than “dOn’T vOtE fOr biDeN!” You have no clue what your end game is.

                  And in case you forgot- I said I had no intention to ever take a thing you say seriously. That means I’m not entertaining any of your questions where you refused to answer mine.

      • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Love seeing both of you in the comment sections of these posts! Far left lunacy needs to be put in check.

      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am

        I am lampooning a certain population on Lemmy who like to come up with an endless variety of specious reasons not to vote for Biden. Some of their reasons are pretty much exactly as I stated, and to me they are outweighed by “Trump wants to kill anyone who disobeys him, so we shouldn’t put him in charge of the military” among other issues, and so hence the lampooning.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I would have been astonished if he hadn’t. I figured he’s the typical old white Republican where the answer to every irritant is to kill it.

  • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    She sat in the same room and did nothing. Now enjoying playing the other side as a political commentator on CNN. Just sayin.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So what?

    At this point, anyone who’s a Trump supporter secretly (or quite vocally) agrees with the policy of executions.

  • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So stunning. I’ve clutched my pearls so hard they’ve… turned into better pearls? Wait that’s diamonds. Dammit.

    They turned into diamonds!