• LimeZest@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    They are already claiming she shouldn’t be eligible because she has no children of her own, only step children. No guy ever has been told he should be ineligible for office over not having children.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      That’s patently ridiculous.

      Also… wanna bet the originalists are going to shut up about “what the constitution says”?

    • ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      she shouldn’t be eligible because she has no children of her own

      By that metric, Trump isn’t qualified because who wants a president that doesn’t have a dog?!?!