YouTube has been spotted testing server-side ads, which could pose a problem to ad blockers.

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is where AI would come in handy. Start scrubbing the buffer as it’s coming in to identify the difference and jump past it.

    • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      It becomes an AI war. They will use AI to make ads to get around the AI blocking. The ads will end up looking very similar to the content.

      Ad: “Hey guys. It’s ya boy, NordVPN, here today to tell you about the dangers of using the internet without my VPN…”

      • ApatheticCactus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’d be watching a car accident compilation and a Buick starts trying to tell me to ask my doctor about Cymbalta. You know… I might actually watch that.

      • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Then you start using ai to put in anti ads that point out all the bad stuff about the usual ad subjects, I’d say get as code to libel/slander as possible without risking a lawsuit

    • Azzu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Aren’t they legally required to indicate that an ad is playing? Should be almost trivial to detect and I don’t know how they’d get around that.

  • Zengen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Let’s develop an AI that can detect where ads in videos start and end. And cut them out client side. Anti corporate advertising AI :D

  • jackyard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    No, I would rather quit watching youtube rather than to watch Japanese style animation porn ads.

    Things look much better if I’m on a US VPN. But I don’t want to get bothered by those porn ads if it suddenly stops (yeah, it sometimes crashes for some reason) or I forget to turn it on. And yeah, I still don’t like Grammarly ads although it’s much better than porns.

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Arse has fallen out of their money printer so they’re getting desperate.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Aha! So this is how one snuck into a video I downloaded last night. Fuckers. At least with a locally downloaded file I can quickly skip ahead.

      • roofuskit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Way back in the day when I used SageTV to record live TV there were programs that would automatically identify commercials and skip them for you. Computers are way more powerful now so I doubt it will be long before there’s and app that automatically downloads your favorite YouTube channels and prescans the videos to skip the ads.

        • Chickenstalker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          I usee to wait by the VHS player and manually press pause while recording tv shows. In ironic retrospect, I find old 80s-90s commercials to be more kino than the tv shows I recorded.

    • Max Günther@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Piped. It uses SponsorBlock to also skip ads by the creator in the video, I am very sure they will update it to remove ads injected by YouTube as well. It is also very privacy-friendly.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Support candidates who want to limit the ability for large tech companies to acquire their competitors. Maybe even those that wish to see their acquisitions rolled back. Maybe even those that wish to see them broken up.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      The alternatives are around now, and we know that many YouTube content creators are exploring other revenue streams, so it’ll be interesting to see how exodus works. Clearly YouTube is going to continue to get worse and some people are going to leave. What’s next? I’m excited.

      It’s always interesting to watch companies implode. Apparently Reddit is blocking non-Google search engines from indexing them, and Twitter wants you to be logged in to view people’s profiles. Those types of moves guarantee that the platform won’t be relevant a decade from now and possibly sooner than that.

    • QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Grayjay has been useful for that. I still follow people on YouTube, but if they setup a channel anywhere else I can switch my feed to draw from those sources instead.

  • elbucho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I find it fascinating how media companies evolved their usage of ads over time. Used to be that the purpose of showing someone an ad was to get them to buy your product. Now, though, the companies who make the ads are paying to have them put on media networks who use the ads to annoy you into paying for a premium membership so you don’t have to see them. It’s double dipping.

    Not sure how I would feel if I made an ad, and YouTube was saying to their users: “Yeah, you like that fucking ad? Super annoying, isn’t it? If you don’t pay me more money, I’m going to cram that annoying bullshit down your throat every time you want to watch a video. I’m going to put ads at the beginning of videos. I’m going to sprinkle them throughout the middle. Hell, I’m even going to make you watch ads after the video ends! You like that, you little bitch??”

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      What makes you think they won’t block them or force ads to them as well?

      You do know that Invidious is still YouTube, right?

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s an open source front end to youtube, yes. So no ads on the sidebar, no bullshit about logging in, no garbage algorithm to be harassed by.

        And no commercials yet. If YT streams the ads and invidious doesn’t block them and adblocker doesn’t block them and PiHole doesn’t block them, I will not watch them.

        Death to Advertisement.

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          I don’t think YouTube cares if you refuses to watch their videos on another platform or not.

          They probably prefer if you didn’t. You only cost them money with no revenue whatsoever.

          • boywar3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            They are still a metric they can peddle to their advertisers to show “how many people see this ad in a month.”

            • lud@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              You don’t think they know how many watch their videos with adblockers or third party clients?

              I highly doubt they accept views from third party clients as valid ad views or probably views at all since that would likely make abuse easier.

              • boywar3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                It still goes to active user counts though. There will still be a footprint left by any view and that can be marketed as “we have X million users daily!”

                • lud@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I doubt the really big advertisers (the only ones that maybe can negotiate) think that’s enough statistics.

  • blady_blah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I would rather pay an add-block company a monthly subscription than give it to YouTube in blackmail. This will just be another salvo in a never ending war.

    • glitchdx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I used to pay for youtube premium. My logic being that I was using an adblocker anyway, and I wanted the content creators I watched to get some kind of revenue for my watchtime. Youtube stopped taking my money a while back, and I can’t be bothered to figure out why. These days, there’s so little content that I find interesting that I spend more time scrolling than I do actually watching videos. It’s only a matter of time until I just stop regularly going to youtube.

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Too Much engagement slop being pumped into the feed and you can’t block offenders on teevee app…

        WTF I lay for this. If I don’t want to see some clown, I should be able to block.

        I report them for misconduct and it seems to reduce the spam but they come back in few weeks amyway…

        Like no I don’t want linus, I don’t want brownlee apple whore… Just stop.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          I paid for it before they removed Google Play Music. I was on one of the plans that was $8 for both Google Play Music and YouTube Red.

  • zbyte64@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I mean I’ll settle for the ad being blacked out and muted while I wait for the content. Or have it play elevator music while I wait.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      or do some back end trickery where they can buffer the video for longer than youtube allows, then selectively clip out the ad parts so you can continue to seemlessly watch.

      • zbyte64@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        I wonder if the server throttles that ads so you can’t 2x the playback speed. Sounds like a good way to detect when the ads are being served.

  • Frank Ring@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Rumble and PeerTube

    EDIT: I’m already paying YouTube with personal data and privacy.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    If only there were hundreds of other sites on the Internet that stream video. If porn sites can make it work, anyone can make it work.