Former GOP presidential candidate Nikki Haley tells 'Special Report' how Republicans can win in November and why the party needs to make a 'serious shift.'
If the organization is not a news organization, then they’re not qualified to produce journalism. Literally the only thing it’s useful for is for firsthand quotes from conservatives that go on it.
Then Assange wikileaks is not a news organization, they’re not qualified to do anything but promote computer hacking. Thus, no journalism freedom. That what you’re saying?
Whether or not you believe Assange is justifiable, if he aided or encouraged people to hack/release classified files, then yes he went beyond journalism. Journalists get brought information from whistleblowers, they don’t actively encourage hacking.
if the government can prove that the WikiLeaks founder actively encouraged or aided Manning in stealing government documents, First Amendment protections would vanish.
I agree, and that’s sad. It would be a better world if we all didn’t have to consider fox news a “news” source at all. But. 46% of registered voters do, so.
But it isn’t news its entertainment
That’s silly. Denying that news is being made is a fanciful as saying Harris is using AI to generate crowds. But, whatever floats your boat.
What are you even talking about at this point? “Denying news is being made”?
You say it’s entertainment. I say it’s news, and couldn’t be anything else.
No, the United States District Court - Southern District of New York says so
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/7216968/9-24-20-McDougal-v-Fox-Opinion.pdf
I’m talking about the article not the organization.
… what?
Intelligent response see ya
You made no sense, and then cry. Good luck!
If the organization is not a news organization, then they’re not qualified to produce journalism. Literally the only thing it’s useful for is for firsthand quotes from conservatives that go on it.
And even then there’s a massive chance Fox is just knowingly letting those conservatives lie on air.
Then Assange wikileaks is not a news organization, they’re not qualified to do anything but promote computer hacking. Thus, no journalism freedom. That what you’re saying?
Whether or not you believe Assange is justifiable, if he aided or encouraged people to hack/release classified files, then yes he went beyond journalism. Journalists get brought information from whistleblowers, they don’t actively encourage hacking.
https://firstamendmentwatch.org/deep-dive/are-wikileaks-actions-protected-by-the-first-amendment/#tab-analysis-opinion
Nice whataboutism btw.
I agree, and that’s sad. It would be a better world if we all didn’t have to consider fox news a “news” source at all. But. 46% of registered voters do, so.