No paywall: Archive.org
“Who needs porn? Just call Jeffery and he’ll get you a girl to jerk you off with a glove on”
SCOTUS’ Uncle Ruckus ain’t gon’ like that
The Intercept - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for The Intercept:
MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this sourceSearch topics on Ground.News
https://theintercept.com/2024/08/16/project-2025-russ-vought-porn-ban/
And video rental?
Btw this is why they call everything a slippery slope. Because that’s what they want to do.
There is still physical video rental outside of libraries? Even netflix shut down dvd-by-mail
This might bring it back! Playboy’s next.
And Redbox is going under.
Going? I thought they shut down operations last month?
Maybe they did? I thought I still saw a machine by the grocery store the other day.
I wouldn’t be surprised if they just abandoned the kiosks.
Dibs
Toe-ing a fine line between larceny and litter cleanup to get there first.
This is exactly it. I see one every time I go to Walmart with a piece of paper over the screen/controls saying it is no longer in operation
This guys closet. It’s full, I guarantee it. Also, who needs porn when couches abound?
Full of what? Dead bodies?
Fetishes, and possibly dead bodies.
I’m not kink shaming, just pointing out that the lady doth protest too much.
This is a man terrified of how horny it gets him when his wife exerts her will at all. Like he’s definitely into it, but he’s so repressed there’s no way he can even process something like being told to wear a collar and take a flogging, no he’s over here thinking he’s some absolute deviant for fantasizing about his wife politely but firmly telling him to go down on her.
There’s a whole world of pleasure and fantasy out there for those who have the self awareness to try what they want, but he’s gonna be some sick freak trying to control how other people fuck so he doesn’t have to ever acknowledge his milquetoast fantasies. The absolute loser.
They want to ban pornography, then claim that same-sex couples showing affection to each other publicly is pornography.
And that trans people simply existing are pornography.
If there’s one positive to take from it, I think it’s quite the compliment to be considered porn walking.
Licks fingers to nips Tssss!
Now if only it weren’t from that greaay cohort…
And give the death penalty to sex offenders, and classify pornography as a sex offense. See where this is going?
The death penalty is porn for conservatives.
What will they do then?
“It’s alright when I do it” is a core pillar of conservative ideology, so it’s fine.
To be fair, most of the book bans going on in Burgerland right now are justified exactly this way: they’re “pornographic” because there’s gay people.
First they came for the communists…
It’s really amazing sometimes that so much legal and political policy is driven by men who are ashamed of their boners.
Thank you, Puritans.
It’s kind of sad
“They can take a woman’s right to her own body . . . But they’ll never take . .
OUR PORN!”
I look forward to porn winning the War on Porn like drugs won the War on Drugs.
There will be a lot of similarities, like how with drugs you never know what’s laced with fentanyl. You’ll never know what conditions your illegal porn is made in. After all, it’s already illegal.
ach! danged sex workers! with their, their, their human anatomy!
“Three local law enforcement officers were hospitalized today when, during a routine traffic stop, a hidden Hustler magazine fell open in front of them…”
“The officers feared for their lives and were forced to discharge their weapons. They performed CPR at the scene but the suspect was pronounced deceased with over 20 gunshot wounds.”
You had me in the first half. I’d figure the magazine would fall out, they’d see titties, and immediately…um…discharge their weapons.
And here you are just plugging some dude trying to rub one out full of holes. What is this, the US?
How do we know the honey pots? 🤔
Please correct me if I’m wrong. I just want to make sure I’m understanding this.
He just admitted that his goal is to quietly litigate porn into non-existence by passing age verification laws on one end, then flood the courts with frivolous lawsuits with all sorts of human rights allegations in order to bankrupt what’s left. And from there, use the same strategy to effectively litigate anything else they don’t like out of existence, while also not making it a campaign issue or even all that well known publicly because he knows that these positions are hugely unpopular and would cost elections, because fuck you that’s why?
He does seem to jump on the Trump method of handling things. Either get what you want legitimately or litigate your opponent into bankruptcy until they don’t have the resources to fight any more. But I’m sure he also heard the call to arms from Clarence Thomas saying that the Supreme Court has their back, so he probably figures if his ilk are going to seize power through the courts because they know they can’t win elections, there’s no better time to do it than now.
I don’t think that will work.
Some of this felt like they think they can get away with it, but now I’m starting to notice that they didn’t exactly account for reality anywhere.
