• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    The thing that bugs me the most about Settings is the amount of wasted white space on every page. You have to do so much scrolling and clicking through tabs just to find various options. By comparison the dialogue boxes of the Control Panel apps are compact and concise. Every time I have to scroll down for something in Settings, I wonder why there’s so much empty space padding around everything.

    You’d think a multi billion dollar corporation could afford a decent UI designer or two.

  • mvirts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Muahaha now I can prepare for my final form: crotchety old man complaining about how they killed off the control panel.

  • esc27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Settings itself has been around in one form or another since at least Win95. 29 years…

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    If Microsoft had actually moved all the settings over to the “new” settings app (it’s 12 years old, btw), I’d be supportive of this.

    It’s a joke that windows has 2 settings apps, and searching for specific settings in the start menu will take you to either, or to both.

    But as we all know, Microsoft won’t do this properly. They’ll likely just continue with their 75% finished settings app while hiding the control panel, and if you need something not in the settings app you’ll have to income some old menu using a run command or some other terrible UX idea.

    MacOS, Android, iOS, Linux distros don’t have this issue. Fucking TempleOS doesn’t have this issue. Microsoft is a $3.2 trillion company.

    The absolute lack of effort they put into Windows is pathetic. They’re a shining example of why monopolies should not be allowed to happen.

    • sqw@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      the thing that most grinds my gears is that there are settings that appear in both control panels and settings, appear to be changeable in both, but only one or the other actually changes anything.

    • el_abuelo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Does Linux have good support for VR yet? Specifically my HP Reverb g2 that seems to be reliant on windows mixed reality…

      • __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I have the same headset, and as of a few weeks ago when I last checked, there is not complete support. I think the display works mostly, but the controllers don’t so it might depend on what you are doing.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’ve never tried VR, but from what I’ve heard it’s hit and miss on Linux right now - certainly not as good as Windows at the moment.

        I know that KDE has a lot of stuff for VR (unsurprising given Valve is pushing for it), and Gnome has just merged a lot of the same, so if you give it a spin I’d recommend an up-to-date distro (say Fedora or Opens use) with either KDE or Gnome.

        I imagine that when Valve releases their new headset, progress will accelerate, but that’s just a guess

        • el_abuelo@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Interesting, thank you

          Also was unaware Valve was working on a new headset! That’s good news as it feels like the market has really stagnated outside of the Meta headsets.

          • BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            I wouldn’t get too excited. Supposedly the next headset is internally called Deckard, and it’s been “about to release” for like 3 years now? Pretty much everything people think they know about it is conjecture based off code Valve has tucked away in SteamVR; zero public statements of intent.

            As for VR on Linux… kinda? I’ve only read terrible things about it online. I have an Index and tried to use it with Mint a few months back, and while it mostly worked without any configuration issues, there was a weird white ring around the edge of the screen that I couldn’t figure out.

      • bluewing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Just a curious question - Is there any VR sets that work with Linux Distros? I’m not much of a gamer to need or want one. Just want to learn for learning’s sake.

    • Manalith@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I hate the settings app so much that I’ve just learned the powershell commands for setting up printers and changing NIC settings. Honestly it wouldn’t be as bad if a. It didn’t take forever to load on occasion and b. I could have two settings windows open at once.

      It’s so hard to find settings there that jumping between network center and add device is not intuitive. If they remove control panel from servers too I might quite my msp job and go work at a grocery store.

    • Vik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I gather that the nt kernel isn’t inherently bad, rather that the aging win32 subsystem is the problem.

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Ew. They should expand their skill set to using terminal/powershell.

      I’m not knocking on GUIs but I will call out “IT professionals” who ONLY know how to use GUIs.

      • Verat@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        To be fair powershell is more recent and windows has always used the control panel for most configuration, they are kind of rug pulling everyone who learned to use it and there arent clear terminal alternatives, for instance, how do I calibrate a game controller’s axis with the terminal?

        • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Hot take, not everything should be powershell or cli. Control panel is pretty straightforward and even I use it from time to time. Because trying to find stuff in Settings is a nightmare.

      • piccolo@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        The whole point of windows is the gui… otherwise i’d just stick with Debian.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Any time on Linux, but the windows shells are unusable. And configuration databases are much more convoluted things on windows than text files

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Hot take but anyone who refuses to rethink how things work during their lifetime causes changes to happen at the pace of 1 change per generation.

      Of course, in this case, the new thing really is inferior.

      • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I have no problem with change. But I do have a problem with Microsoft’s lack of QC or proper design methodology.

        • wesley@yall.theatl.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah if the settings panel had feature parity with but with a better user experience nobody would mind but it’s less features AND a worse experience.

          I remember trying to change some mouse settings on windows 10 but they removed the ability to get to the old mouse options from the desktop. I drilled down through the settings app and eventually buried deep I found where it would let me open up that same old mouse settings model to get to what I wanted to change. More clicks, more searching, and less features = poor user experience

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            I really love how many of the buttons in settings either open an edge web page where Microsoft shrugs at you or just opens the control panel for you to actually get something done…

            But hey when I need to turn off transparency effects cause it’s making all my taskbar icons disappear every time I swap desktops the new settings page works great. Sometimes.

            God they needed actual competition. Or something.

      • foo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I mean I use windows and Linux for home and work. I’m happy with a changing ecosystem. The control panel is, often, the best tool to get shit done on windows.

  • seaQueue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    This would bother me more if I hadn’t switched to Linux full time 5y ago. Microsoft is gonna Microsoft I guess.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Every one of these Microsoft controversies since I ditched them has just validated my decision.

  • papabobolious@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Classic Microsoft move to implement something new, then not let go of the old thing and run them jankily side by side. Settings / Control panel is a prime example.

    And at work its janky crossovers between Active Directory and Azure/Intune/Entra/other dumb names.