minigubben's lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 10 months ago

Exclusive: Kamala Harris surges ahead of Donald Trump in latest poll taken after DNC

www.usatoday.com

external-link
message-square
22
fedilink
1
external-link

Exclusive: Kamala Harris surges ahead of Donald Trump in latest poll taken after DNC

www.usatoday.com

return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 10 months ago
message-square
22
fedilink
Big shifts by Hispanic and Black voters, young people and lower-income Americans give the new Democratic nominee momentum.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s still all comes down to a coin flip in Pennsylvania

    God help us

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Let’s hope for a full Orange Turd flush.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      He’s a big’un. Better get the poop knife.

    • expatriado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      if doesn’t, we know now not to use the sink plunger

      • Jesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Waffle stomp him

      • atocci@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Toilet plunger gang rise up

    • noride@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      You can’t flush a turd that landed on the seat, he is going to run every single election until he dies.

      Honestly, I love that for the Republican party. Perpetually nominating the same dildo over and over, despite losing the election by a wider margin each time.

      • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        In 4 years I’m not sure he’ll be able to put together a sentence, let alone run for office again. His cognitive decline is accelerating with more slurring (both kinds), and just freezing mid-word and pivoting to some other thought because he can’t say or finish the word he wanted.

        It will be interesting if the debate will have better mics than his iPhone to get his “perfect audio” that doesn’t make him sound like he forgot to put his teeth in like his “interview” with Musk. =)

        • finley@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          He can hardly put together a sentence now…

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It’s so nice to see Kamala Harris popularity rising, but is it just me? Or can everybody else not see Trump popularity on 538?

    Trump: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/approval/donald-trump/
    No graph nada ???% vs ???%

    Harris: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/approval/kamala-harris/
    Graph up to date ending Aug. 28 - 48.4% dis vs 42.5% Approve

    Biden: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/approval/joe-biden/
    Graph up to date ending Aug. 28 - 54.2% dis vs 39.9% Approve

    I tried a different browser and I tried for a couple of days. The graph for Trump never shows?
    Seems a bit suspect IMO, are they obscuring bad Trump numbers?

    • cybervseas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think they only look at approval ratings when someone is in office. In face those old approval rating polls for Trump probably are actually from January 2021.

      For this election cycle you want to look at the favorability ratings for the two candidates instead.

      https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/favorability/donald-trump/

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Ah OK that explains it.
        Thank You. 👍

        Still they do have a similar number that’s comparable, it’s just called favorability instead of approval? https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/favorability/donald-trump/

        Funny how many disapproved of Trump, but now favor him anyway?

        • cybervseas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s a different question. Something like “How do you approve of Donald Trump’s job as president?” instead of “How favorably do you view Donald Trump?” Exactly what question you ask, and how you ask it, can make a big difference on how people answer.

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yes, good point.

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      “Approval” means “job approval”. It only applies to incumbents, because it asks “Is X doing a good job in office?”. Your last chance to disapprove of Trump was January 2021.

      “Favorability” applies to everyone, it asks “Do you like X?”

  • vegeta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Not enough: vote

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    As usual, national polls, yadda yadda.

    Let’s see the state breakdown now:

    Arizona: Toss Up. Harris +1, Trump +3
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/arizona/

    Nevada: Toss Up. Harris +2, Tie
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/nevada/

    New Mexico: Harris +8/+11
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/new-mexico/

    Texas: Trump +3/+5
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/texas/

    Georgia: Harris +1/+2
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/georgia/

    Florida: Trump +3/+4
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/florida/

    North Carolina: Trump +1/+2/+4
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/florida/

    Virginia: Harris +3
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/virginia/

    Pennsylvania: Toss Up, 2 tied polls, Trump +1/+4/+5

    Michigan: Harris +2, tie
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/michigan/

    Wisconsin: Harris +4/+5, Trump +1
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/wisconsin/

    Minnesota: Harris +5/+7/+10
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/minnesota/

    So… changes from last time…

    Nevada moves from Harris to toss up. Georgia has moved more to Harris. Michigan is still Harris but getting closer.

    Plotted on the map, Harris only needs 1 of the three toss up states to win. Trump needs ALL THREE to hit 271.

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      For contrast, Nate Silver’s model now has Harris less likely to win the EC:

      “Harris is ahead by 3.8 points in our national poll tracker — up from 2.3 points the day before the Democratic Convention began — which does suggest some sort of convention bounce. However, she’s fallen to a 47.3 percent chance of winning the Electoral College versus 52.4 percent for Donald Trump. (The numbers don’t add to 100 because of the possibility of an Electoral College deadlock.)”

    • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Love your comments. Keep them up

      Also if there’s a place to follow you, especially closer to the election let me know

      I recently joined mastodon and follow almost no one there, so if you are there with these analysis definitely let me know

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I’m a mod here so I post this stuff all the time. :)

        Generally if you see a post reading “National poll says…” I’ll have a comment in it.

        I also do the Trump Indictment checklist.

        There will be a giant megathread for election day.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago
    USA Today - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for USA Today:

    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
    Wikipedia about this source

    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/08/29/kamala-harris-donald-trump-suffolk-usa-today-poll-results/74984967007/

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Polls are not enough. Vote.

    But show these polls to the apathetic. There is a good chance to win this, don’t give up. Show up.

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 22 users / day
  • 22 users / week
  • 315 users / month
  • 3.18K users / 6 months
  • 0 local subscribers
  • 24.1K subscribers
  • 17K Posts
  • 439K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org