“They’re all committed to it now, because Chuck has made them take a public position. Every Democratic challenger, I’m told, running for the Senate is taking the same position,” McConnell said. “I think they fully intend to do it if they can.”

Thanks for advocating for a good reason to have democratic control of the senate

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Just once, I wish the Dem leadership would be anywhere near as based as Republican demagogues always pretend they are 😮‍💨

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Nice to have some reasons to vote for them instead of just voting against nakedly racist authoritarianism.

  • eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    democrats never did when they had the opportunity and needed it. why would they now if they don’t need it?

    • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      When was that? Like 2008? Or are you talking about the ultra slim margin we had that was composed of bait and switch Sinema and Ol’ House Boat Manchin?

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        it’s always one or 2 democrats and it will always be; it was lieberman the last time before sinema and manchin.

        • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Always is a terrible word. We need to ensure that filibuster removal is run on and believed by all Democrats we elect so even if it is 51/49, we can change the filibuster rule or remove it entirely.

        • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Democrats have and always will have a rotating villain to blame when they don’t want to pass something. The same way they will always have party sheepdogs

            • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              You have now entered the circular logic phase of defeatism.

              Next comes:

              “Democats never get anything done, though!”

              ^pst they can’t they don’t have enough votes^

              “They should learn to compromise then.”

              … sometime later

              “They just give Republicans everything they want.”

              Give the democrats a real majority. They will certainly fuck some things up because the corporations can’t have senators doing their job but at least let’s see how progressive these Dems can really be.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Self fulfilling prophesy. You dumb fucks are the REASON we have a bitch of a time getting more than the slimmest of majorities.

  • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Oh no Mitch, you mean you’ll actually have to do your job instead of sending Ted Cruz out to read Green Eggs and Ham? I feel so bad for you.

    • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Filibusting senators don’t even do that anymore. All the senator has to do is send an email saying that they will filibust.

      • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        There’s nothing in the constitution about the filibuster. It’s just a Senate rule and the current version (where you don’t have to make long speeches in an ultimately doomed attempt to block legislation with majority support) dates to the 1970’s. They adopted it because in the TV era, Senators were filibustering just to get on the national news and make a name for themselves.

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s just tradition at this point. And tradition is just peer pressure from dead people.

          Also: we know Republicans don’t give a single flying fuck about tradition when the shoe is on the other foot and it’s getting in the way of their power grabs. The Supreme Court would be very different if they actually cared about respecting traditions in government (amongst many other things)

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Is that quote accurate?

    I thought there would be 30 seconds worth of ellipses in between.

    • JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Don’t worry, he’ll go down in history as “The hypocrite who screwed over Barrack Obama and Merrick Garland, and set the country back decades in social justice.”

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I would hope so, or at the very least go back to ye olden days of “You want a filibuster? Get your ass up there and hold the floor…”

  • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Republicans are just waiting for the opportunity to do it themselves. They literally do not care. They just like the idea of the democrats doing it so they can sqwak about decorum.