• Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    No, Smith’s desire was only to redact names of persons in this oversized filing, nothing else.

    • kmartburrito@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      You’re not quite correct, It’s actually much more nuanced than that. I’ll reply as soon as I’m off work and can put the right amount of effort into it.

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        You’re talking about what happened a year ago. I’m talking about what happened in the last few weeks. Smith wanted only to redact the names of people or organizations that weren’t previously identified for this motion.

        • kmartburrito@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          What you’re talking about is irrelevant, because the judge will operate in a manner that is consistent with her original ruling, and that insulates her from pushback or criticism. What happened a year ago is directly relevant here because it set the outcome.