• Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I already said that the Dems believe they can court some of the pro-frack without losing the anit-fracks. I think this is wrong, but that’s why they are doing this.

      You just don’t agree with the strategy, but it’s still the answer.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I already said that the Dems believe they can court some of the pro-frack without losing the anit-fracks

        58% want to ban, they don’t need any pro-fracking votes…

        This is common everywhere fracking has been done, the people that live around it don’t want it.

        And Dem voters across the country don’t want.

        So Kamala being pro-fracking is zero gain of votes, and hurts the environment making climate change worse.

        I asked for a valid reason, it’s apparent you won’t give one. There’s no point in anything else if you still don’t get it.

        • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          No the problem is you need to define valid for everyone else. You not liking a valid reason doesn’t make it less valid. Clearly this word means something different to you in this context.