- cross-posted to:
- politics@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- politics@lemmy.world
So we don’t feed Monk, here’s a clean article with some commentary from me and a few quotes:
Some Democrats worry, for instance, that the party still isn’t doing enough to engage low-propensity Black and Latino voters, particularly young men.
I think Obama is keying on that. It’s brutal out there for young people. They feel abandoned by American politics in general, and may not remember the shitshow that was Trump, mainly because…
Democrats also wonder if they failed to define Trump early in the cycle, letting him slowly rehabilitate his favorability numbers. Still others fear they didn’t remind voters early on of the horrors of Trump’s first term, leaving them with rosy memories of his presidency—including blue-collar voters’ fond impressions of the Trump economy. Those latter two problems may not be repairable in time.
Ain’t that the truth. Americans are DUMB and have the collective memory of a goldfish. Assuming they’ll remember last week is a bad assumption. Why aren’t I seeing more ads online and on TV reminding us of kids in cages, firing key workers before a pandemic, sharpies and hurricanes, and all the other bullshit this bullshit artist has done. Start it now.
There is still time to fix this problem, many of these Democrats say, and the PAC’s resource sharing has improved in recent days. But time is running out.
Would like to see more details of how it’s improving…
The PAC, they say, favors ads on broadcast television aimed at broad audiences—when reaching young and nonwhite voters requires a more targeted digital approach because their media sources have grown so fractured.
Why not both? This might be why Walz is on a World of Warcraft stream and Harris went on ‘Call her Daddy’, though. We’ll have to reach out to the youth where the youth is.
A Democrat familiar with the Super PAC’s thinking pointed out that it is currently running a heavily backed ad featuring a Black, blue-collar narrator talking about Trump’s tax cuts for the rich.
That’s a good idea. Are they pairing it with Trump’s ties to Project 2025 and his abhorent treatment of kids at the border? Remind voters that right before the pandemic that upended the world, Trump fired the entire pandemic team? And then called it a Dem Hoax when it happened?
Meanwhile, some Democrats say that the PAC didn’t put enough resources into early ads defining Trump
Yep. I am one, if you can’t tell. ;)
It’s a basic truism of politics that winning campaigns were run by geniuses and losing ones were run by numbskulls. So if Harris wins, Future Forward will appear to have gotten all this right, perhaps brilliantly so. But if she loses, the recriminations—not just directed at Future Forward, but all throughout the party—will be severe.
Alas, this is true. Hindsight is 20-20. We’ll see on the morning of the sixth…
Hey, hear me out, maybe instead of trying to find the right messaging and playing world of warcraft they could stop arming the guys airstriking refugee tents.
New Republic - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for New Republic:
MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this sourceSearch topics on Ground.News
https://newrepublic.com/article/187094/harris-future-forward-2024-election
Folks, win or lose, the aftermath of election day will be a shitshow. I’ve written up a guide for how to survive Election Day 2024. The TL;DR: form is prepare for a hurricane or blizzard, with a nod to crazy people by preparing for self-defence, then be ready to hunker down. Election 2024 promises to be crazy, given how 2020 went down. Please look after yourselves!
For those anxious about that possibility, we can help move the needle
Make sure to register to vote. Deadlines are fast approaching in many states
Find opportunities to volunteer for dems around you and online
Write letters to voters in swing states or in competitive downballot races