• Elextra@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    My employer has DEI but to prevent cuts from funding, they just changed the name and kept the policies. Its unfortunate but its better than having these policies and programs cut.

    • Bieren@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Trump: We have to end dei. It’s ugly and bad and super scary.

      Companies: Just rename it. That talking Cheeto can’t read the policy anyway.

    • blakenong@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      It never should have been loud in the first place. Just have them. Do them. It doesn’t even need to be called DEI. These are things that should exist as a norm.

      • AreaKode@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        Exactly. And if you want DEI removed, you’re gonna have to define it for me. Cause all I hear is “woman and minorities.”

  • h4x0r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    It’s a shame ‘DEI’ has become so political. Generally speaking, these policies strengthen teams and improve outcomes. Even in terms of biology, non-diverse populations are (typically) less likely to survive long term.

    • bean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      People think it means ‘affirmative action’. Like straight up. Those people who complain most are almost always making it sound like it’s only there to give people jobs which shouldn’t have them.

      What it was intended for was to increase diversity, hence ‘D’, which improves the amount of perspectives and views and capabilities. This diversity strengthens teams in businesses.

      People seem to think it means: ‘hand jobs over to people who are minorities, just because’

      It’s so incredibly stupid and frustrating.