• jqubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      The advantage browser-based ones have is it’s generally easy to copy/paste any text you need. I used one that ran as its own desktop software and made many of the key text fields uneditable, instead of letting you copy text from them but refusing to save any changes to those fields that must not change. Want to grab the order number for this customer? Too bad! Type it yourself or export it to PDF and copy it from there! I was so happy when I discovered a little program that lets you copy any text on the screen by effectively taking a screenshot, running OCR on the screenshot, and putting the output onto your clipboard. Still took more effort than simply right-clicking the text and hitting copy, though, or double-clicking and hitting Ctrl-C.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I dont think that poor UI programming for dedicated programs is an argument for browser based solutions.

        I have issues with poorly programmed UIs in browser based tools all the time.

        • morrowind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          Tbh it kinda is, because the browser gives the end user more control, since you have extensions and access to the underlying html. You can get around most stupid UIs with little effort, but on desktop you’re doomed

    • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      My university recently switched most of the student enrollment and stuff to SAP, even though they had a very nice system that was launched only a couple of years prior. SAP is so awful, my god. Apparently the switch was mandated by the government or some crap like that. I’m honestly baffled.