Do they want Baphomet in their schools? Because this is how you get Baphomet in your schools.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    How can these people say they love America, the Constitution, and the Founding Fathers when they’re doing the opposite of what they wanted? Every religious law added to government sets us 100 years back.

    • djsoren19@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      it’s actually very simple. The Republicans in charge are evil and don’t care, while their followers are too uneducated to know any better.

  • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The article uses the term “1st state to” like they’re about to start some kind of domino effect of similar requirements across other states.

    I fear the implication may be correct.

  • XPost3000@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “simply one of many documents that display the history of our country and foundation of our legal system.”

    The Magna Carta:

    skeleton underwater meme

  • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    And here’s news: if you are appalled by this and you are NOT buying a gun and learning how to use it then you are an absolute fucking idiot. If you come on here and start pissing and moaning about “ammosexuals” and “2A fantasies” and whatnot then you are a fucking idiot. NONE of those assholes care about your rights or your feefees or about “the law” or voting; they hate you and want to kill you and they are desperately waiting for someone to give them the word. If you are NOT ARMING UP FOR PROTECTION then you will get the boxcar you deserve.

    • Liz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lol I agree with you, but there’s other posts in here that will get you better traction than this one. I recently saw one about a lawmaker proposing a national registry of pregnant people. That one would have an audience more amendable to the point that they really do want to dominate and exterminate their enemies.

      Though effective opposition requires organization, armed or not. The organizations that would be used for armed resistance when necessary are only marginally different from the organizations fighting for positive change within the system right now.

      • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The thing is that its all incremental. Liberals here should understand how incrementalism works because they propose it all the fucking time. Commandments in schools is the basis for pregnancy registrations and then killing or imprisoning gays and then government-sanctioned white supremacy etc etc. There are not enough reasonable people to stop this. There is no situation in which the creep to fascism ended without lots of violence. I’ll be fine; I’m white and in a very tolerant area…but I come from the places where the fascists are breeding and mark my words: liberals absolutely DO NOT UNDERSTAND who they’re dealing with. Most of the murders of “undesirables” won’t even make the local news, and certainly won’t be investigated or prosecuted.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Always been a gun owner, they would have done nothing for me in any of my arrests except get me killed or get police officers killed and place me in prison for likely life…

          You won’t be able to shoot police officers when they come to arrest you and walk free. An actual militia will not happen again in the u.s.

          • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Again, you’re focusing on “the authorities”. You’re going to need them against civilians. But this just reinforces my point: you dont know who you’re dealing with.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      do you run a local militia? How many armored vehicles do you have there?

      also, BOXCAR? ARE YOU COMPARING THIS TO THE FUCKING NAZIS? BRO THIS IS THE TEN COMMANDMENTS!

      • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You really, really, REALLY do not understand any of this. It has nothing at all to do with militias. It will be your neighbors committing violence against your other neighbors with the state’s blessing. And yes I am absolutely comparing them to the Nazis as any reasonable, rational, sensible person should do if they dont want to wind up in the aformentioned boxcar.

  • cum@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t want to donate to the opposition, I want to ban anyone pushing anti constitution bullshit like this from government for life. Why is there no consequences for this?

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s certainly illegal. But Louisiana is in the fifth circuit court of appeals, which is hilariously conservative. That’s the same court that covers Texas, and a few other southern states. Packing the fifth circuit with conservatives was a large part of the Southern Strategy. Now the appeals court is packed with hardline conservative judges. Whenever you hear about appeals courts being blatantly biased for conservatives, it’s almost always the fifth circuit.

      So yeah, it’s illegal. But even if Louisiana courts strike it down, the fifth circuit appeals judge will likely reinstate it as soon as it crosses their desk.

      • GraniteM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s also a theory that they 5th circuit exists to make terrible rulings so that the Supreme Court can overturn it but do it in such a way that it still advances some horrible agenda.

        Something along the lines of:

        5th Circuit: You can totally post the ten commandments in schools, because hoorah Jesus!

        Supreme Court: You can’t actually post the the ten commandments in all schools, just the private ones, oh and by the way it’s totally cool and legal to drain all the funding out of public schools and give it to private schools.

  • Veedem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is obviously going to be a lawsuit to stop this if the governor signs off. It seems to fly directly in the face of the constitution.

    • qantravon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It does fly in the face of the constitution, and multiple SCOTUS’ have affirmed exactly that several times.

      • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah but we don’t have a SCOTUS anymore, we have a group of fascist fucks doing what the dollar tells them

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Aha but this time we will find out which of the plaintiffs or some amicus curiae can afford the better RV.

    • psmgx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It will be overturned after months of totally unnecessary court wrangling.

      LA lawmakers will then say “we tried to enact your will, voters, but those godless fat cats in DC wouldn’t let us!”

      Meanwhile said lawmakers will make no actual attempt to fix the status quo, and the wrangling and debate will ensure entrenched powers stay in power.

    • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It clearly does, and allowing this to be enforced clearly breaks precedent, but with how the Supreme Court is now who knows what will happen.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    You have to be careful, though. In the wrong hands, philosophy can be a dangerous thing.

    Keep promoting ideas like “Thou Shalt Not Kill”, “Keep the Sabbath Holy”, and “Don’t Worship False Idols”, and people might start thinking all our wars, our insane work schedules, and our fetishistic consumer culture aren’t good.

    Given the habits of your average Louisiana legislator, you might want to scrap the Seventh Commandment entirely.