minigubben's lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
lemmyisprettycool@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago

Elon hasn't successfully deployed a satellite since March. Over 1200 inactive satellites according to space-track.org and satellitemap.space. Yahoo now reports SpaceX willing to sell shares.

tiblur.com

external-link
message-square
44
fedilink
0
external-link

Elon hasn't successfully deployed a satellite since March. Over 1200 inactive satellites according to space-track.org and satellitemap.space. Yahoo now reports SpaceX willing to sell shares.

tiblur.com

lemmyisprettycool@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
44
fedilink
️Tiblur
tiblur.com
external-link
Tiblur is a privacy centered social media platform. Watch video, look at images, vote in polls, and listen to audio.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • krimson@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    https://satellitemap.space/starlink/launches.html

    I hate Elon as much as the next guy but your post doesn’t make sense.

    • lemmyisprettycool@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That just shows satellites in the air. Doesn’t show if they are working. The normal activation time is 3 days. Not 3 months.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      A few months back there was a guy spamming dubious or outright loonie “SpaceX is a total failure!” articles from this site, switching to new accounts to post from as each got banned.

      Guess he’s back.

      • lemmyisprettycool@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Interesting, because Suspicious Observers reported on it because of the Lemmy post.

      • MrPoopyButthole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep this account is 3 hours old

        • lemmyisprettycool@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          70 upvotes on the post, try harder Elon Lol

          • MrPoopyButthole@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Don’t be so pathetic. I love to hate on Elon. He’s disgusting to me. But you’re shady AF and your arguments don’t stand up to the facts.

            • lemmyisprettycool@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              My arguments are sourced by data directly from defense contractors. Take it up with them.

  • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Huh? They launched plenty of Starlink satellites since March, they may not be enough to keep up with the shutdowns, but rockets have been going up.

    https://spaceflightnow.com/launch-log/

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Space X has over 1200 inactive satellites

      I know they’re relatively small but 1200 seems like a lot to be up there doing nothing.

    • lemmyisprettycool@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They get them up there but they are not being deployed.

      • atocci@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        What does “deployed” mean in this context, then?

        • lemmyisprettycool@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I should have said “activated”. I corrected it so people would understand.

    • lemmyisprettycool@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Spaceflight now is a blurb talking about the launches. There’s no evidence these satellites are active. No defense contractor is waiting three months for a deployment. Also, no amount of Elon shill upvotes will convince anyone you are right when you are clearly completely wrong.

      • atocci@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        There aren’t any defense contractors involved in this, it’s a commercial internet service from a for-profit company. They can take as long as they want to activate their satellites as long as they’re still communicating with the ground, which they are.

        • lemmyisprettycool@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          SpaceX is a defense contractor. They handle the majority of the United States govts. satellites. They are working with Northrup Grumman. They are definitely a defense contractor.

          • atocci@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Fair, bad choice of words on my part. What I was trying to say is that Starlink isn’t a government owned asset, it’s a commercial product. While it has the potential for defense applications, the government has no reason to pressure them to activate satellites faster than SpaceX want to.

    • atocci@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah not to defend Elon or anything, but this post seems pretty misleading now that I’m looking into it. It doesn’t look like they’re failing to deploy satellites at all. They’re up there and communicating with the ground based on every tracking site I’m looking at (including the one linked in the post). I don’t know why the new satellites aren’t being added to the network as soon as they’re launched, but these satellites aren’t dead so it seems way more likely to be a logistical choice rather than literally every satellite launched in the last 3 months immediately failing.

      • lemmyisprettycool@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You have a link to back up that statement?

        • atocci@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The fact that they’ve been launching satellites for months? Here’s a Starlink satellite that launched last week I guess. You can search for Starlink in the catalog there and see tons of others in orbit as well from launches just over the past few weeks.Wikipedia also graphs all the Falcon 9 launch outcomes and it looks like they haven’t had a failure to deploy a satellite to orbit since 2016?

          Can you back up the claim that these satellites are failing before they’ve even been turned on? That seems like something that would be covered pretty extensively.

          • lemmyisprettycool@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m not contesting the rocket launches. The whole point is that the normal activation time is 3 days. It was the nearly the same for all of the versions. The V2 had the largest with 5 day activation time. The activation time on these is 90 days+. My point is he’s trying to raise money to cover for the fact his activation time is now 90+ days.

  • 😈MedicPig🐷BabySaver😈@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    False info. Reported for removal.

    • lemmyisprettycool@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Reported for false report.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’ve hit complete accuracy just with the first three words of your title. He’s a massive failure that somehow people keep hyping and paying attention to.

    • _sideffect@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Failure? Not really.

      He wouldn’t be worth 230b if he was a failure.

      Is he a lying, manipulative, vindictive person? Absolutely

  • toast@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Post of info on Tiblur by a now 3 hour old lemmy account

    Ah, yes, oh so reliable

  • Zip2@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Charge the fucker with space fly tipping.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fly tipping

  • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yay more space trash in earth orbit

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Kessler Syndrome! Let’s Go!

      • atocci@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thankfully, these things are at least too low to stay in orbit indefinitely like that

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Almost as if people thought ahead about this stuff.

          • atocci@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Wild concept, that planning ahead thing is

    • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      At LEAST it’s low orbit so it’ll burn up (relatively) quickly.

      • krimson@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Does it burn up completely? Nothing gets left behind?

        • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hard to say, but with how few sizeable chunks of natural stone/metal meteors make it through it’s tough to expect some relatively fragile satellites would survive the trip down.

        • noodle (he/him)@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Does it burn up completely?

          nope https://mastodon.social/@tayledras/112541250492523932

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s part of a Dragon capsule, not a Starlink satellite.

            • noodle (he/him)@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              ah. my bad.

        • decerian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          After a few years the orbit will degrade enough that it’ll start to fall back to earth. At that point, the satellite will either burn up completely on re-entry, or partially and the rest will fall to earth.

          Either way, each of these satellites will be completely gone from orbit after a few years.

        • t0fr@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          We’re only now starting to try and ensure spacecraft are designed in such a way that they completely break up.

          Shape/size/material all have an impact on whether something completely breaks up

          https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Preparing_for_the_Future/Discovery_and_Preparation/Design_for_demise_bringing_spacecraft_down_safely_and_efficiently

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Did he finally wrest the reins from Gwynne Shotwell? She was calling the shots pretty effectively for a while.

    • thesporkeffect@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is my question too. What changed?

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nothing, this article is nonsense.

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


  • @L4s@lemmy.world
  • @autotldr@lemmings.world
  • @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks
  • @wikibot@lemmy.world
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.28K users / day
  • 2.57K users / week
  • 5.59K users / month
  • 8 users / 6 months
  • 0 local subscribers
  • 58.7K subscribers
  • 12.7K Posts
  • 537K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemm.ee
  • L4sBot@lemmy.world
  • fry@fry.gs
  • L3s@fry.gs
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@fry.gs
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org