minigubben's lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
lemmyisprettycool@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago

Elon hasn't successfully deployed a satellite since March. Over 1200 inactive satellites according to space-track.org and satellitemap.space. Yahoo now reports SpaceX willing to sell shares.

tiblur.com

external-link
message-square
44
fedilink
0
external-link

Elon hasn't successfully deployed a satellite since March. Over 1200 inactive satellites according to space-track.org and satellitemap.space. Yahoo now reports SpaceX willing to sell shares.

tiblur.com

lemmyisprettycool@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
44
fedilink
️Tiblur
tiblur.com
external-link
Tiblur is a privacy centered social media platform. Watch video, look at images, vote in polls, and listen to audio.
  • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yay more space trash in earth orbit

    • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      At LEAST it’s low orbit so it’ll burn up (relatively) quickly.

      • krimson@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Does it burn up completely? Nothing gets left behind?

        • noodle (he/him)@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Does it burn up completely?

          nope https://mastodon.social/@tayledras/112541250492523932

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s part of a Dragon capsule, not a Starlink satellite.

            • noodle (he/him)@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              ah. my bad.

        • decerian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          After a few years the orbit will degrade enough that it’ll start to fall back to earth. At that point, the satellite will either burn up completely on re-entry, or partially and the rest will fall to earth.

          Either way, each of these satellites will be completely gone from orbit after a few years.

        • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hard to say, but with how few sizeable chunks of natural stone/metal meteors make it through it’s tough to expect some relatively fragile satellites would survive the trip down.

        • t0fr@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          We’re only now starting to try and ensure spacecraft are designed in such a way that they completely break up.

          Shape/size/material all have an impact on whether something completely breaks up

          https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Preparing_for_the_Future/Discovery_and_Preparation/Design_for_demise_bringing_spacecraft_down_safely_and_efficiently

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Kessler Syndrome! Let’s Go!

      • atocci@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thankfully, these things are at least too low to stay in orbit indefinitely like that

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Almost as if people thought ahead about this stuff.

          • atocci@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Wild concept, that planning ahead thing is

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


  • @L4s@lemmy.world
  • @autotldr@lemmings.world
  • @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks
  • @wikibot@lemmy.world
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.28K users / day
  • 2.57K users / week
  • 5.59K users / month
  • 8 users / 6 months
  • 0 local subscribers
  • 58.7K subscribers
  • 12.7K Posts
  • 537K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemm.ee
  • L4sBot@lemmy.world
  • fry@fry.gs
  • L3s@fry.gs
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@fry.gs
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org