• residentmarchant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s truly amazing…they must stand at the front of meetings and just ask “how do we make our passengers hate us most?”

      Maybe I don’t understand the economics of this move, but are they really going to make that much more money from targeted ads? If it’s double the price, I assume it’s worth it, but if it’s a ~10% gain it’s just dumb.

      • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Numbers must go up at all costs. By the time the company’s reputation hit rock bottom, the CEO already jumped ship to the next company.

  • Voytrekk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can you turn the screens off? I haven’t flown in 5 years, but I just watched stuff off of my tablet instead.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can, but I’ve stopped ever using them because the screen completely stops for every. Single. Announcement.

      And now you can have your phone out for take off and landings, so yea no thanks I’ll stick with my device that keeps working when they’re making some random announcement about drinks or some shit

    • LdyMeow@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      In my experience yes, but some planes ive notice they turn back on each time there is an announcement, so depending on how many it can be annoying. Eother way advertising is a cancer that plagues our lives more and more.

    • SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you still can, they’ll find ways to disable the option to turn them off, because it’s time you don’t watch an ad.

    • residentmarchant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Basic economy will eventually only let you select any ad in their library. Actual content is for regular economy passengers only!

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      About a decade ago Fox News got brought to court, and had to defend themselves against the idea that their content wasn’t actually factually accurate most of the time. Therefore not “news”.

      Fox responded by saying that their program wasn’t meant to be news. I forget the exact quote, I’m sure duckduckgo is your friend, but it was along the lines of “No reasonable person would ever consume Fox News content and believe it to be trustworthy accurate news. It is an opinionated entertainment show about the news.”

      I don’t remember their tagline at the time, but it was something along the lines of “Fox News is your only outlet for unbiased news!” Something to that effect. I just remember Jon Stewart calling out the hypocrasy of their tagline being the exact opposite of what they said in court.

      If Fox News is entertainment meant to push the agenda that the right is right, and if CNN is entertainment meant to push the agenda that the left is right, then I don’t see why The Onion can’t join them as entertainment meant to push the agenda that the whole world is fucking stupid.

      Still operating as a “real news source”, except it’s all bullshit like Fox News and CNN. Just entertainment.

      • MoonMelon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same thing happened with “VitaminWater”, a product in the category of “enhanced water” (a term reminiscent of “enhanced interrogation technique”). Coca-Cola argued that, despite the name, no reasonable person would believe it’s actually healthy. They settled.

  • MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    For those of you contemplating ways of covering up the ads:

    This is the same airline that beat the shit out of that doctor because the airline overbooked the flight. For your own safety, do not cross this airline.

      • reversebananimals@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “If you don’t like it don’t fly”

        Seriously just shut up.

        Edit: LMAO just saw your other comment where you actually said this sincerely. You’re a parody of yourself.

      • Drusas@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Have you ever turned a screen off on one of these planes? They turn back on. So you turn them off again. Sooner or later, they turn back on. And repeat.

        • SolidGrue@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have. It usually stays off until they rig the cabin for final approach. Comes back on for landing but hey, whatever?

          I’m getting beaten up for my stance here, but seriously: if all it takes to put you over is some midflight ads the do the rest of us a favor and don’t fly. Take a train or whatever.

          Y’all are acting like they’re gonna strap us down and tape our eyes open like that Alex Whasisname kid in A Clockwork Orange. I assure you that doesn’t happen for another 22 years in this timeline (give or take).

          • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Depends on the plane and system it has. Last United flight I was on it stayed off the entire flight. I use my phone and generally don’t look at it anyway but it was nicer I suppose.

          • Drusas@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think you’re being beaten up for it. I certainly am not beating you up for it. But usually, yeah, the screen does come back on during the flight. I think they turn it back on automatically every time there’s an announcement. As somebody who finds screens like that very distracting and even migraine-inducing (the “busyness” of that sort of thing is a big trigger), it’s really frustrating.

          • mriormro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            People like you constantly give corporations an inch because “it’s not a big deal” and here we are.

          • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I honestly couldn’t care less how many adverts they show me, they can have a constant stream of adverts the whole flight if it means that some shitty corporation is paying a portion of my travel coats.

            People really need to grow up about stuff like this, if you don’t want adverts then pay for a premium service - I’m poor, I’ll accept the adverts.

            • Laurel Raven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Here’s the thing: companies have learned they can add ads to make additional money without passing any of that on to their customers.

              If you think you’re going to get a better rate for having ads, you’re fooling yourself. They’ll always charge as much as they can get people to pay and that amount isn’t affected by ads most of the time.

            • wagoner@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              That money isn’t subsidizing your flight cost, it’s increasing corporate profits.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can, there’s a button combo. It changes sometimes but if you spam a few things I can always black it out

          But that’s not the point, it still sucks

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Overbooking should be a mandatory minimum compensation of the greater of 1000x the ticket price or $20k. It’s a truly fucked up practice to disrespect people’s time like that.

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Chicago Department of Aviation did that. The same way if the police ends up killing someone, it was not the person calling the police.

      • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        United was booting passengers to make room for employee transfers though, the situation was shit before dept of aviation even got the call.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Those employees could have stood. Frontier and Spirit give vouchers out when they intentionally overbook…which before the pandemic was everyday. If nobody takes the bait, they up the voucher value. For them it’s essentially monopoly money.

          If United couldn’t get anybody to bite at the vouchers, then the employees should have stood the whole flight. Instead, they beat a man who was not fighting back physically. He only insisted that he get to his patient. They LITERALLY dragged him off the plane. By his ankle, as he tried to grab onto anything he could.

          • aeharding@vger.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            If United couldn’t get anybody to bite at the vouchers, then the employees should have stood the whole flight.

            Yeah, that is not a solution. The FAA is salivating at the thought of this. Everyone must have a seat for takeoff and landing.

        • Eheran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure, but telling someone to leave their plane for some oddball reason is “only bad” not outright crazy like what happened then.

      • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        it was not the person calling the police.

        At this point anyone calling the police in the US is a necessary accomplice, and guilty of conspiracy to commit murder, aggravated battery, and probably several other crimes.

  • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So I am going to sit down and the screen will be full of penis enlargement pills? What will all the hot singles in the area think?

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you’re getting targeted ads for penis enlargement pills, then the system thinks you have a small pp. If this is an error, you should submit photographic evidence to their office to prove you don’t have a small pp.

  • Cosmo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The thing I hate is that all these airline screens usually default to “on”, and people tend to leave defaults. I’m a tall person, and can usually see a large number of the screens in front of me. So if I’m on a night flight, even if I don’t intend to sleep, the only way to not be blinded by dozens of ads for a few hours is to bring a sleep mask.

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel so bad for tall people on planes. It’s uncomfortable AF for all of us, but you guys have to become human origami just to sit. It’s insane that this shit is legal. I avoid flying as much as possible.

      • CodingCarpenter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m tall and fat it’s a double whammy. Granted one I’ve done to myself, luckily I generally only fly with my wife so I can get the isle seat to stretch

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Also, ths taller you are, the more likely you are to be seriously injured in severe turbulence, malfunctions, minor crashes and major crashes.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s uncomfortable AF for all of us

        Idk, I’m pretty comfortable on planes, and I’m around 5’8 lol

    • Drusas@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They also automatically turn the screens back on repeatedly after you turn them off.

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I assume they won’t allow porns in ads, but you can still get worse stuff than porn, like erectile dysfunction medication ads which causes people around your seat to look at you with sorry eyes.

  • ME5SENGER_24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    More to consider when selecting an airline. Greedy fuckers, I hope their stock takes a nosedive thanks to this

    • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’ll probably take a small dip and then rise quite a bit once profits from implementing it start rolling in

      • Tanoh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        And if it succesful, or at least passenger doesn’t boycott them over it, it is just a question of time until other airlines adds it as well

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Seriously. It’s nearly a sure thing. I should buy on Monday and see how it goes. People are sleepwalking about adtech shit so they’ll continue to fly United. There’s already a dude in this thread telling people to chill and just don’t fly if they don’t like it. The ad revenue should be pretty juicy, too. They have a bored captive audience identified by full name and credit card number.

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Most people will be too busy with their laptops, tablets, and phones to pay any attention to whatever ads they put on those screens.

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It certainly wouldn’t be OK for anyone that actually wants to use the in flight entertainment. I watch whatever TV shows and movies that I downloaded ad free and never turn on the seat back screens.

  • reddwarf@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    And for the low, low price of $4,99 you will get not one, not two but three ad blocking devices you can use to stop these ads from bothering you! Available in several cute patterns and colors. Get yours now, call now!

    (warning: do not wash these cloths above 105°F or there might be ad-spillage while using the ad blocker due to shrinkage)