Does this wreck her chances of becoming President?
She’d had to of had a chance to wreck it. The fart in the wind has more chance at a positive impact than any third party presidential candidate.
Doesn’t concern me. I’m not voting for her.
I remember when you ran the communities for her before you deleted them.
Yep! And now I run the Socialist Workers Party community. And the Socialist Workers Party X account. And their Mastadon account. And I’m also finishing up graphic design work for them to be used in shirts, hats, stickers, etc. It’s been fun. Thank you! :)
Maybe they can break seven thousand votes this year.
Maybe! We’ll see. Thank you!
Silly, there’s no president of Ohio
Russian shills should be banned from running to begin with. She should be banned just do taking Russian money, and for having trumps lawyers represent her in bad faith.
I don’t mind her.
Everyone knows, and everyone knows why.
Yay! Though I’m still not voting for her.
Everyone knows, and everyone knows why. And it’s not what you think.
And it’s not what you think.
Oh then let me in on this big reason! Should be interesting!
Oh… no. You know. As does everyone. I’m not here to waste my time on this. You said dumb shit and I called you out. That’s where this ends because thats all it was ever going to be.
Have the day you deserve.
I don’t know what you’re talking about or why you’re upset. You said, “And it’s not what you think.” And I asked you what it is, since according to you, what I think is obviously wrong. So I was asking you to help me out.
But hey, you seem upset, so if you don’t wanna answer that’s cool.
So I’ll just assume I’m right then. And I hope you have the day you deserve as well. Thank you! :)
Everyone look at how OP engages with people in these posts. They are clearly here to spread propaganda and engage in bad faith.
I didn’t write the article, friend. I just posted it. Thank you!
He/she is clearly not saying you wrote the article. He/she is taking about how you are engaging with people in the comments.
Not to be a pedant, but “they are” is a much less jarring way to refer to someone of unknown gender than “he/she is.”
Good point.
I’m responding to comments in a genuine way and expressing my actual views. If people get upset by that, it’s not my responsibility to make them feel better. Everyone’s entitled to their own opinions, just like I am. Thanks!
You are changing the topic. Comment OP didn’t say you wrote the article. That was an assertion you created yourself in response to them. So you mischaracterized their comment. And that was my point: that you mischaracterized it.
I made no explicit judgement about whether you are debating here in the comments in good faith or not. I was pointing out that your response was inaccurate.
However your response/deflection here kind of supports their original point that you are arguing in bad faith in these comments.
The poster said, “Everyone look at how OP engages with people in these posts. They are clearly here to spread propaganda and engage in bad faith.”
I’ve explained how I respoond.
And since the commenter suggested I was posting “propaganda,” so I simply pointed out that I didn’t write the article. It was shared from a reputable news source, not produced by me. Unless he believes that the news organization itself produces propaganda, then his argument doesn’t hold up.
Thank you!
OP’s original comment (emboldened relevant word by me):
Everyone look at how OP engages with people in these posts. They are clearly here to spread propaganda and engage in bad faith.
IN these posts, not WITH these posts. You engage INSIDE (in) posts via comments. He/she was talking about your comments.
The op said “in these posts.” Meaning with these posts. I stand by what I said. Posts and comments are different things.
If op meant in the thread or in the discussion or in the comments, then it’d be different. But they said “posts.” So I was correct in how I responded. Thank you! :)
Votes cast in Ohio for Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein will not count because the party nominated her running mate after a state administrative deadline, according to state election officials. [1]
[1] https://apnews.com/article/election-ohio-green-party-jill-stein-f3268366b754150877605a83a95ad0ec
Sounds like the only “accusations” should be leveled at Stein’s campaign which, yet again, couldn’t muster the basic competency to comply with state election laws and regulations… despite having 4 whole years to prepare. It’s almost like the Greens aren’t a serious political party!
They seem to run their local elections much better. And as much baggage as Jill has, they need to pick a different candidate for the next run. I actually like her, but this should be her last run.
The Plain Dealer - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for The Plain Dealer:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this sourceSearch topics on Ground.News
This account was created fifty-one days ago and in that time has made four thousand and fifty-four submissions to Lemmy.
That averages out to one every eighteen minutes and six seconds twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week.
Sounds about right.
Quantity over quality.
In the 447 days that the @SatansMaggotyCumFart account has been active, it has made over eight thousand two hundred and fifteen submissions to Lemmy, which is on average eighteen posts every single day!
That’s one every hour and twenty minutes!
I just posted some more stuff too. So please update the stats. Thank you for your interest! :)
How would your submissions update my stats?
Are you even paying attention to our conversation?
I just posted a few more articles in the Socialist Workers Party community. Can you add these to the running stats you seem to enjoy keeping track of? Thanks for your help, friend!
Sometimes I feel like you shitpost too quickly to have actual conversations.
I’m not shitposting though, so not sure what you mean by that.
